40/ 100
F
OverallF14/100
Nite Ize RunOff Waterproof Phone Case

Dexcraft · Waterproof Personal Electronics

Nite Ize RunOff Waterproof Phone Case

F · High PFAS

Skip. Waterproof coating composition undisclosed, PFAS risk unclear.

Verdict: SkipWaterproof coating composition undisclosed; material likely TPE/PVC with potential for plasticizer leaching and degradation over time. Use with caution and monitor condition.

Phone case relies on waterproof treatment without material or coating transparency. Nite Ize provides no PFAS disclosure, making risk assessment difficult for this product category commonly treated with fluorinated compounds.

The safe swap

Pelican M40 Micro Case

Pelican

Pelican M40 Micro Case

100/100 safety

A

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its A.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Likely TPE or PVC with waterproof coating, unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The RunOff case is constructed from a flexible elastomer material, most likely TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) or PVC (polyvinyl chloride), with an undisclosed waterproof coating applied to seal seams and block water ingress. Both TPE and PVC can leach plasticizers such as phthalates into contact surfaces, especially when exposed to heat, oils, or prolonged moisture. The waterproof coating itself is not characterized on the product label or Dexcraft's website, which prevents assessment of whether it contains PFAS or other problematic water-repellent chemistries. Over months of use, the elastomer can degrade and become sticky or brittle, particularly if exposed to direct sunlight or stored in hot vehicles.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dexcraft (the manufacturer behind Nite Ize RunOff) provides minimal material transparency on its product pages and does not publish a public chemical disclosure statement or PFAS policy. No independent certifications (such as oeko-tex, GreenGuard, or similar) are listed for this product. The company has not issued a public statement addressing PFAS in waterproof coatings or other product lines. This silence on composition is typical for budget outdoor-gear brands but limits consumer ability to verify safety claims.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof phone cases occupy a middle ground between soft-shell protective cases and hard waterproof enclosures. Hard cases (polycarbonate or acrylic) generally avoid plasticizer leaching but are heavier; soft elastomer cases like the RunOff are lighter and more form-fitting but carry higher material-degradation risk. Competitors (such as OtterBox and LifeProof models) also rarely disclose coating chemistry, though larger brands are more likely to respond to PFAS inquiries. Budget-tier cases like the Nite Ize RunOff typically use cheaper TPE formulations with minimal quality control on coatings.

If you buy it

Store the case in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight and heat sources to slow elastomer degradation. Do not leave it in a hot car or expose it to prolonged UV light, as this accelerates breakdown and potential leaching of plasticizers. Inspect the case every 6 to 12 months for cracking, stickiness, or separation of the coating; discard if deterioration is visible. Rinse with fresh water after exposure to salt water or chlorine, and air-dry fully before sealing your phone inside to prevent bacterial or mold growth.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Plasticizer leaching (phthalates, BPA, or other plasticizers in TPE/PVC)

If material is TPE or PVC (most likely), the base elastomer may contain phthalates or similar additives to maintain flexibility. Prolonged contact with warm skin, moisture, or phone oils can promote leaching, especially if the elastomer degrades over time.

Possible

Waterproof coating composition unknown (potential for PFAS or other fluorinated compounds)

Waterproof coatings on textiles and elastomers frequently use fluorinated water-repellent chemistries (including PFAS). Nite Ize does not disclose the specific coating used, making it impossible to rule out PFAS or assess the concentration.

Reported

Material degradation and outgassing with heat or UV exposure

Elastomer cases are known to degrade in sunlight and heat, releasing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and potentially increasing plasticizer volatility. Users have reported odors and sticky residue on phones after extended storage in warm environments.

Possible

Coating adhesion failure and flaking

Budget waterproof coatings often separate from the base material after months of flexing and moisture cycling. Flaking coating particles could shed onto skin or into the phone port, though acute toxicity risk is low.

Possible

Bacterial or mold growth if case is not fully dried after water exposure

Sealed waterproof cases trap moisture if stored damp. The warm, dark interior creates an ideal environment for bacterial and fungal growth, which can contaminate the phone and cause skin irritation on contact.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Personal Electronics

Pelican M40 Micro Case

Pelican

M40 Micro Case

Polypropylene copolymer plastic case with solid construction, no Teflon-family coating

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern. Rigid PP case with no waterproofing treatment.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Pathfinder MagSafe Case for iPhone

Urban Armor Gear (UAG)

Pathfinder MagSafe Case for iPhone

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and metal alloy components

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. TPU phone case has minimal PFAS risk profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Pathfinder Case for Galaxy

Urban Armor Gear (UAG)

Pathfinder Case for Galaxy

TPU polymer, impact-resistant composite

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, but no PFAS transparency from UAG.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof personal electronics grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.