Dana Design · Waterproof Outdoor Bags
Dane Ikast 2 Motorcycle Backpack
Waterproof backpack with no PFAS disclosure. High uncertainty.
Motorcycle backpack likely has water-repellent coating waterproof coating but Dana Design provides no transparency on treatment type or PFAS content. Cannot assess risk without material disclosure.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Nylon/polyester with waterproof coating (type unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Dane Ikast 2 uses nylon and polyester as base fabrics with an unspecified waterproof coating applied to achieve water resistance. Polyester itself is chemically stable under normal conditions, but the coating composition is the critical unknown. Waterproof coatings on textiles are the most common PFAS delivery vector in apparel, though non-fluorinated alternatives (polyurethane, wax-based) exist. Without disclosure of the coating chemistry, you cannot rule out persistent fluorinated compounds or older poly-PFC technologies.
The brand's record and disclosure
Dana Design (the manufacturer of the Dane Ikast line) has not published public material safety disclosures, PFAS policies, or relevant third-party certifications on their website or major retailer listings that are readily available. There are no documented recalls or public safety controversies specific to this model. The brand's silence on waterproof coating chemistry is typical of smaller outdoor gear manufacturers but represents a disclosure gap rather than confirmed safety failure.
How it compares in its category
Motorcycle and outdoor backpacks commonly use waterproof coatings; major brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, The North Face) increasingly disclose PFC-free alternatives or PFOA/PFOS phase-out timelines. The Dane Ikast 2's lack of any transparency puts it in the unverified middle tier. Comparable alternatives from brands with explicit non-PFAS waterproof claims are available, though often at higher price points. This backpack's category peers range from explicit PFC-free to undisclosed, making informed choice difficult.
If you buy it
Avoid prolonged heat exposure (direct sunlight for extended periods, machine washing above warm water) as this can accelerate coating breakdown and potential leaching of unknowns. Store in a cool, dry place and inspect the coating yearly for cracking or peeling; replace if compromised. Do not dry clean or use harsh chemical treatments. Clean with mild soap and water only. If durability issues emerge within 2-3 years, consider it a trigger for replacement rather than repair.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Waterproof coating composition (unspecified)
Nylon/polyester backpacks with unnamed waterproof treatments may contain fluorinated compounds (PFAS), polyurethane, or older PFC-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) formulations. Without manufacturer disclosure, the specific chemistry cannot be verified. This is the primary non-PFAS chemical uncertainty in this product.
Azo dyes in polyester
Polyester textiles are routinely dyed with azo dyes; reputable manufacturers in developed markets comply with REACH and CPSIA restrictions on carcinogenic azo dyes. No specific recall or test failure is on record for Dana Design products. Risk is low if sourced from compliant manufacturers, but no third-party certification is evident.
Coating degradation over time
Unspecified waterproof coatings on outdoor gear degrade with UV exposure, mechanical stress, and temperature cycling. As the coating breaks down, micro-particles and any embedded chemicals may become mobilized. Backpacks with unknown coating chemistry lack durability benchmarks, making long-term performance unpredictable.
Formaldehyde resins in adhesives or finishes
Textile laminates and coatings may use formaldehyde-based binders; modern EU/North American outdoor gear typically avoids this. No public testing or recall suggests this is a likely concern for this product, but it is not ruled out by the brand's silence.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Bags
Granite Gear
Wrought Iron Food Pack
nylon fabric pack, likely uncoated or minimally treated
Food pack likely lower concern; confirm no water-repellent coating with brand.
⚠Risky category by default
More waterproof outdoor bags grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.