DAME · Tampons
Dame Super Tampons (x14) Hypoallergenic 100% Plastic Free Tampons pH Neutral No Toxins 100% Compostable Fully Biodegradable Super (14 Tampons)
Lower PFAS concern; uncoated natural materials align with claims, but no third-party verification.
Dame Super Tampons are marketed as plastic-free with organic cotton and cardboard, which inherently eliminates the coated synthetics where PFAS typically hide. The brand's explicit "no toxins" positioning and compostability claims support avoiding fluorinated treatments.
Brand says: “100% Plastic Free, pH Neutral, No Toxins, 100% Compostable, Fully Biodegradable”
Shop DAME on Amazon →Material
100% organic cotton, cardboard applicator, no synthetic coatings
Brand disclosure
Brand claims PFAS-free
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Brand-stated PFAS-free
The brand states the product is PFAS-free (self-declared).
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Dame Super Tampons use 100% organic cotton for the absorbent core and a cardboard applicator, eliminating synthetic polymer coatings that are standard in conventional tampons. Organic cotton production avoids synthetic pesticide residues that can accumulate in the fibers during growth and bleaching. The cardboard applicator replaces plastic, removing risk of microplastic shedding and reducing persistence of applicator materials in the body. No synthetic binders, adhesives, or chemical surfactants are listed in the composition.
The brand's record and disclosure
Dame makes explicit PFAS-free claims and markets the product as free of synthetic coatings and toxins, though the company does not appear to hold third-party certifications (e.g., GOTS or Cradle to Cradle) that would independently verify these statements. No recalls, contamination incidents, or safety controversies have been publicly documented for this product line. Brand transparency is reasonable for the direct-to-consumer menstrual product sector, though independent lab verification of PFAS and pesticide residues remains absent from public sources.
How it compares in its category
Most conventional tampons use rayon or rayon-cotton blends with chlorine bleaching, synthetic surfactants, and plastic applicators; many also include dioxin residues from elemental chlorine bleaching processes. Dame's 100% organic cotton and cardboard design place it in a lower-chemical tier typical of premium eco-conscious brands. The tradeoff is higher cost and reduced availability compared to mass-market alternatives; compostability claims align with fiber-based construction but require industrial composting infrastructure.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place to prevent mold or bacterial growth on unbleached cardboard applicators, particularly in humid climates. Ensure the product is used and disposed of according to package instructions; compostability requires industrial facilities and is not guaranteed in home compost or standard waste streams. No special handling precautions are needed during use. If you experience unusual irritation, it may indicate an individual sensitivity to cotton rather than a product defect; discontinue and consult a healthcare provider.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Pesticide residues in organic cotton
Although organic certification standards restrict synthetic pesticides, cross-contamination or residual contamination from soil can occur; Dame does not disclose third-party testing for pesticide residues on finished tampons.
Dioxin residues from bleaching
Unbleached or oxygen-bleached organic cotton avoids elemental chlorine bleaching, which is the primary source of dioxin in conventional tampons; no dioxin concerns are documented for this product.
Bacterial or mold growth on cardboard applicator
Uncoated cardboard applicators can absorb moisture and harbor microbial growth if stored in humid conditions; proper storage is essential to prevent contamination.
Formaldehyde-releasing resins or fabric treatments
Organic cotton with no synthetic coatings or resin binders eliminates common sources of formaldehyde; no preservatives or antimicrobial treatments are documented in the product.
Heavy metals in pigments or dyes
Natural cotton with minimal dyeing or pigmentation and cardboard applicator present no documented source of heavy metal accumulation; no color additives are noted in product claims.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Tampons
Seventh Generation
Organic Cotton Tampons Applicator
organic cotton (tampon & applicator core); cardboard applicator
Lower-concern buy, organic cotton & MADE SAFE cert reduce PFAS risk, though brand is silent on the topic.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Lola
Organic Cotton Tampons
organic cotton (no synthetic coatings)
Lower concern, uncoated organic cotton with transparent PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Cora
Organic Tampons with Applicator
organic cotton tampon with cardboard/plastic applicator
Lower-concern choice; organic base material and MADE SAFE cert suggest thoughtful sourcing, but no explicit PFAS commitment.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More tampons grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.