Coty · Lipstick & Lip Products
Vintage Coty Originals Cremestick Lipstick Evening Rose Gold Metal
Vintage lipstick. Lower concern, but brand offers no transparency.
Coty does not disclose PFAS use in cosmetics. Lipstick formulations typically use wax, oils, and pigments with minimal PFAS risk, though waterproofing agents sometimes contain them. No testing data available for this product.
Shop Coty on Amazon →Material
lipstick wax base, metal container
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Coty Originals lipsticks from this era typically use wax-based formulations (likely paraffin or beeswax blend) with pigments and emollients, housed in a metal tube. The metal container is inert and does not leach into the product, unlike plastic or certain ceramic coatings. Vintage formulations predate many modern regulatory restrictions, so ingredient transparency is limited by age and historical records. The closed metal design minimizes air and light exposure, which can degrade colorants and preserve stability over decades.
The brand's record and disclosure
Coty has not published modern safety certifications or ingredient disclosures for historical Originals lines; the brand remains silent on PFAS and other chemical transparency initiatives. Current Coty products carry no widely publicized recalls related to heavy metals or contamination in classic lipstick formulations. The vintage status means this product predates modern cosmetic labeling requirements, so original ingredient lists are rarely available to consumers. Coty's parent company now emphasizes reformulation of legacy lines, but this specific vintage product reflects 1980s-2000s manufacturing standards.
How it compares in its category
Vintage Coty lipsticks occupy a lower-scrutiny position in the lipstick market compared to modern brands subject to current FDA oversight and third-party testing. Many contemporary premium lipsticks now disclose heavy metal limits and avoid synthetic dyes linked to allergic reactions; vintage formulations typically lack these safeguards documented. The metal container is a safety advantage versus plastic or unlined aluminum tubes, which can corrode or leach. Coty's historical market position as a mass-market affordable brand means formulations were optimized for cost rather than premium ingredient sourcing.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent pigment degradation and wax softening, especially since metal conducts heat. Do not expose to temperatures above 35 Celsius (95 Fahrenheit) to avoid bloom or color shift. Discontinue use if you notice rancid odor, discoloration, or visible mold, which indicate age-related degradation. Perform a patch test on inner lip or skin first if you have known sensitivities to synthetic dyes or perfume, as vintage formulations often contain fragrance allergens not listed on the tube.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Heavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic)
Vintage cosmetics predating strict FDA pigment limits may contain trace heavy metals in iron oxides or synthetic colorants. No specific testing or recall on record for this product, but age and era suggest formulation predates modern contamination controls.
Synthetic dye allergens and azo dyes
Coty Originals formulations of this era commonly used synthetic azo dyes and coal tar colorants not listed individually on packaging. Allergic contact dermatitis and sensitization have been documented with vintage lipstick formulations in this price and market segment.
Fragrance allergens and undisclosed sensitizers
Vintage Coty lipsticks are known to contain fragrance blends and parfum, with components not individually listed. Coumarin, musk compounds, and essential oils common in 1980s-2000s formulations are linked to delayed-type allergic reactions and irritation in sensitive users.
Formaldehyde releasers (preservatives)
Older cosmetic formulations frequently used formaldehyde-releasing preservatives like DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea to extend shelf life. Documentation for this specific product is unavailable, but prevalence in vintage cosmetics suggests residual risk.
Talc contamination (if present as filler)
Coty lipsticks do not typically use talc as a primary ingredient; wax-based formulations dominate this line. No specific contamination concerns or asbestos findings on record for Coty Originals lipsticks.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More lipstick & lip products grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.