75/ 100
C
OverallF63/100
Corpus N° Green Body Wash

Corpus Christi · Body Wash

Corpus N° Green Body Wash

C · Moderate

Lower-concern choice; body wash typically avoids PFAS-prone formulations, but brand transparency is absent.

Verdict: BuyAqueous body wash formulation with lower PFAS risk; no established hazards on record; brand transparency absent but product category presents minimal concern.

Body washes are not a typical PFAS exposure route, they lack the water-repellent, grease-resistant, or non-stick coatings where PFAS are commonly added. Corpus Christi makes no public PFAS claim or disclosure about their formulation, leaving the ingredient list as the only verification available to consumers.

Shop Corpus Christi on Amazon →

Material

aqueous body wash formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Corpus N° Green Body Wash is an aqueous (water-based) cleansing formulation, the safest delivery matrix for personal care products because it avoids volatile solvents and concentrates hazardous chemicals. Body washes typically contain surfactants (cleansing agents), humectants (water-binding), and preservatives, none of which pose acute toxicity risks at use concentrations on intact skin. The "Green" designation suggests plant-derived or naturally-sourced ingredients, though without detailed INCI listing available, specific botanical claims cannot be verified. Aqueous formulations inherently limit exposure to formaldehyde releasers, phthalates (which require organic solvents), and 1,4-dioxane contamination compared to alcohol or glycerin-based products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Corpus Christi (Corpus N°) maintains no publicly available ingredient transparency, ingredient list, or third-party certifications on record. The brand shows no documented safety controversies, recalls, or regulatory enforcement actions in the body wash category. Absence of disclosure regarding PFAS, preservative systems, or allergen labeling reflects a transparency gap typical of smaller personal care brands; this limits independent verification of formulation safety. No EWG certification, Leaping Bunny, or dermatological testing claims are documented.

How it compares in its category

Body washes are among the lowest-risk personal care category because exposure is brief (rinse-off), diluted by water, and limited to outer skin. This product sits in the middle-to-lower risk segment; certified alternatives (Burt's Bees, Seventh Generation) offer ingredient transparency; premium brands (Vanicream, CeraVe) provide clinical testing data. The aqueous base alone eliminates several hazard pathways (VOC inhalation, phthalate absorption) that affect creams, perfumes, or concentrated rinse products. Green marketing claims are common and unregulated; ingredient verification would be needed to assess legitimacy.

If you buy it

Use as directed on wet skin and rinse thoroughly with water; rinse-off products present minimal systemic absorption risk. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to preserve preservative efficacy and prevent bacterial growth in the aqueous base. Discontinue use if skin irritation, rash, or itching develops within 15-20 minutes of application; this signals possible sensitization to surfactants or undisclosed fragrance allergens. Shelf life is typically 12-24 months unopened; discard if discoloration, separation, or odor change occurs, indicating possible preservative breakdown.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)

Body washes marketed as "Green" often contain botanical fragrance blends (essential oils, plant extracts) without detailed INCI transparency. Common allergens include limonene (citrus), linalool (floral), and geraniol; sensitized individuals may experience contact dermatitis, though incidence is low (~2-3% in rinse-off products).

Possible

Preservative system hazards

Aqueous formulations require preservatives to prevent bacterial/fungal growth; common choices include parabens, phenoxyethanol, or methylisothiazolinone. Without ingredient disclosure, type and concentration are unknown; parabens carry low risk at use levels, but methylisothiazolinone can trigger sensitization in susceptible users (rare).

Possible

Surfactant irritation potential

All cleansing products rely on surfactants (anionic, nonionic, or amphoteric agents); high concentration or prolonged contact can cause temporary dryness, irritation, or barrier disruption, especially on sensitive skin or if rinsing is incomplete.

None known

Microbial contamination during storage

No documented contamination events recorded for this brand. Risk is low if preservative system functions properly and container closure integrity is maintained; risk increases only if product is stored in humid environments (bathrooms) without tight capping.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or colorants

Body washes rarely use colorants that concentrate lead, cadmium, or chromium; rinse-off exposure and low systemic absorption make this a category-low concern. No reports on record for this product or brand.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.