20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Columbia Trail Traveler Ii Backpack

Columbia · Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Columbia Trail Traveler Ii Backpack

F · High PFAS

water-repellent coating treatment suggests PFAS risk; Columbia provides no disclosure.

Verdict: SkipNylon/polyester backpack with undisclosed water-repellent coating carries PFAS risk; no major safety recalls on record, but Columbia's silence on chemistry warrants cautious use and awareness of washing practices.

This backpack likely uses water-repellent coating treatment typical of outdoor packs, which commonly contains PFAS. Columbia does not publicly disclose coating chemistry or PFAS status.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Trail Traveler II combines nylon and polyester fabrics with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior. water-repellent coating coatings are commonly formulated with fluorinated compounds to achieve water resistance without a heavy plastic layer. Nylon itself is chemically stable in normal use, but polyester can degrade and shed microfibers, especially during washing and wear. The water-repellent coating treatment is the primary chemical concern in this product's lifecycle.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not published detailed chemical disclosure or water-repellent coating composition data for consumer-facing products like this backpack. The company has faced no major recalls or formal safety findings specific to this model or material class. Columbia holds no prominent third-party certifications (such as Bluesign or OEKO-TEX) for chemical management on apparel, which is standard for premium outdoor brands. Their silence on PFAS and water-repellent coating chemistry is common in the industry but limits transparency.

How it compares in its category

Most outdoor backpacks in this price range use similar nylon/polyester blends with water-repellent coating coatings; few brands fully disclose fluorine-based treatments. Brands like Fjallraven and some Patagonia lines now offer PFC-free or fluorine-free water repellent options, making them more transparent alternatives. The Trail Traveler II is typical for its market segment but lags competitors on chemical accountability. Choosing a non-water-repellent coating or wax-treated pack eliminates this hazard entirely, though it requires more active maintenance.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently and use cool water with mild detergent to minimize microfiber shedding and potential release of coating chemicals. Avoid machine drying or heat exposure, which can degrade synthetic fibers and coatings. Do not use fabric treatments or stain guards, as these may add additional chemical layers. Check seams and coating annually for damage; heavy wear or delamination signals end of product life and should trigger replacement.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-repellent coating

Nylon backpacks with water-repellent coating finishes commonly use fluorinated repellents (legacy PFOAs or PFOS alternatives like GenX) to achieve water resistance. Columbia does not disclose its water-repellent coating chemistry, making PFAS presence unconfirmed but likely given industry standard practices.

Likely

Microplastic shedding from polyester

Polyester components will gradually shed microfibers through normal wear, abrasion, and washing. This is inherent to the material and cannot be eliminated, only minimized through gentle care and infrequent laundering.

None known

Azo dyes in synthetic fabrics

No recalls or documented issues with azo dyes in Columbia nylon/polyester apparel. However, standard apparel industry testing does not routinely screen for azo dye metabolites in consumer products; risk depends on Columbia's supplier vetting, which is not disclosed.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Nylon and polyester fabrics can be treated with formaldehyde-containing resins for wrinkle resistance or crease retention. Columbia does not disclose finish chemistry for this backpack, so presence is unconfirmed but not reported as a concern in product documentation or recalls.

Possible

Coating degradation and leaching

water-repellent coating coatings degrade with age, exposure to sunlight, and washing, potentially releasing coating particles or residuals. Long-term storage in heat or repeated outdoor use without reapplication can accelerate breakdown, particularly in seams and high-stress areas.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Granite Gear Wrought Iron Food Pack

Granite Gear

Wrought Iron Food Pack

nylon fabric pack, likely uncoated or minimally treated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Food pack likely lower concern; confirm no water-repellent coating with brand.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.