20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Columbia PFG Dry Bag Roll Top Waterproof Gear Sack Navy Blue Kayak Hiking Gear

Columbia · Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Columbia PFG Dry Bag Roll Top Waterproof Gear Sack Navy Blue Kayak Hiking Gear

F · High PFAS

Waterproof coating type unknown; high PFAS risk likely.

Verdict: SkipPolyester dry bag with unknown water-repellent coating poses unconfirmed PFAS risk; Columbia silent on chemistry. Buy only if PFAS-free alternative unavailable; verify care instructions.

Roll-top dry bags typically use water-repellent coating coatings that often contain PFAS, but Columbia does not disclose coating chemistry. No third-party verification available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester fabric with waterproof water-repellent coating (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This dry bag is constructed from polyester fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating. The specific water-repellent coating chemistry is not disclosed by Columbia. Most polyester water-repellent coating finishes historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS family), though some manufacturers have shifted to fluorine-free alternatives. Without certification or disclosure, the coating type cannot be confirmed, leaving the PFAS exposure profile uncertain.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sports Wear has not published a public PFAS elimination timeline or material transparency statement for its gear lines. The company does not advertise PFAS-free certifications or third-party water-repellent testing data on consumer product pages. This silence is notable in a market where competitors (Patagonia, some REI Co-op lines) have committed to phasing out PFAS in waterproof gear. Columbia's lack of proactive disclosure suggests coating chemistry remains conventionally fluorinated.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof dry bags occupy a high-risk category for PFAS because durable water repellency nearly always required fluorinated chemistry until very recently. Columbia's mid-market pricing and lack of eco-certifications position it as a conventional choice; certified PFAS-free alternatives exist from brands like Patagonia and some outdoor retailers with transparent supply chains. The polyester substrate itself is standard and lower-risk; the coating is the primary hazard vector.

If you buy it

Store the dry bag in a well-ventilated area for the first few days to allow any volatile off-gases to dissipate. Avoid prolonged contact with skin or food storage, as the coating can migrate with prolonged moisture and friction. Wash hands after handling, especially before eating. Do not heat or machine-wash at high temperatures, which can degrade the coating and increase leaching. Replace if the waterproof layer visibly peels, flakes, or loses water-repellency, as damaged coatings may shed particles.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS in water-repellent coating (waterproofing)

Columbia does not disclose the water-repellent coating chemistry. Historical industry practice and the absence of a fluorine-free claim strongly suggest conventional fluorinated (PFAS) coating. Exposure occurs through skin contact, inhalation of coating particles during wear, and potential leaching into water.

Possible

Azo dyes in navy polyester

Navy polyester fabric may be dyed with azo compounds, which can cleave into aromatic amines under sweat, heat, and friction. Columbia does not certify against restricted azo dyes on this product line. Risk is low for outdoor use but increases with prolonged skin contact in warm, wet conditions.

Possible

Formaldehyde in polyester finishing resins

Polyester fabrics often receive formaldehyde-containing resins for wrinkle resistance and shape retention. This dry bag shows no zero-formaldehyde certification. Formaldehyde outgassing is typically minor at room temperature but may increase in direct sun or during storage in sealed bags.

Reported

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

water-repellent coating coatings on polyester degrade with washing, UV exposure, and wear. As the coating breaks down, fine particles can shed into water bodies during kayaking or hiking use, and microscopic particles may be inhaled or ingested via hands-to-mouth contact.

Possible

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester fabric may contain antimony as a catalyst residue from manufacturing. Levels are typically below regulatory thresholds, but direct, prolonged skin contact with treated polyester can allow trace migration, particularly in wet or warm conditions.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Granite Gear Wrought Iron Food Pack

Granite Gear

Wrought Iron Food Pack

nylon fabric pack, likely uncoated or minimally treated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Food pack likely lower concern; confirm no water-repellent coating with brand.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.