20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Columbia Convey III 27L Backpack

Columbia · Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Columbia Convey III 27L Backpack

F · High PFAS

water-repellent coating raises PFAS concern; Columbia provides no transparency.

Verdict: SkipRipstop nylon backpack with water-repellent coating finish poses possible PFAS exposure; Columbia silent on chemistry. Safe if used as intended, but transparency gap warrants caution.

Columbia does not disclose PFAS status or water-repellent coating chemistry for this pack. Standard ripstop backpacks often use PFAS-based water repellents, though some brands now use fluorine-free alternatives.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Ripstop nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Convey III uses ripstop nylon, a tightly woven synthetic polymer prized for durability and tear resistance. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric is the material concern: historically, water-repellent coating coatings on outdoor gear relied on long-chain PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") to repel water and oils. Modern formulations vary widely, and Columbia has not disclosed whether this backpack uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating or newer alternatives. Ripstop nylon itself is chemically stable during normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not published a clear, public commitment to PFAS-free chemistry or phased elimination timelines, unlike some competitors (e.g., Patagonia's detailed PFAS reduction roadmap). The company does not list water-repellent coating formulations on product spec sheets or sustainability pages available in public records. This silence is notable in an industry where PFAS transparency has become a market differentiator. No major recalls or confirmed health incidents tied to this specific model have been documented.

How it compares in its category

Most outdoor backpacks in the 27L midrange segment use ripstop nylon with water-repellent coating treatment; the Convey III is standard for its price tier and durability profile. Alternatives like Osprey and REI Co-op products have begun disclosing PFAS-free water-repellent coating or using wax-based water resistance instead. Some budget brands omit water-repellent coating entirely, accepting reduced water repellency. The Convey III does not stand out as either a leader or laggard in chemical transparency within its category.

If you buy it

Use and care are low-risk: avoid direct heat sources, machine washing, and strong solvents that could degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially mobilize residual fluorochemicals. Wash by hand in cool water with mild detergent if needed; allow air drying. water-repellent coating coatings naturally degrade after 2-3 years of heavy use; when water no longer beads, the protective layer has worn away, not failed dangerously. Replacement or professional re-coating is an option if durability matters, though neither is necessary for safety.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-repellent coating

water-repellent coating finish composition not disclosed by Columbia. Conventional long-chain PFAS in outdoor textiles can leach through skin contact or washing; newer short-chain alternatives exist but are unconfirmed for this model. Risk is low during normal dry use but higher if backpack is repeatedly washed or worn against skin for extended periods.

None known

Formaldehyde resins in dyes or finishing

No recalled or documented formaldehyde-release incidents tied to Columbia ripstop nylon products. Standard ripstop fabrics may contain trace formaldehyde-based dyes or wrinkle-resist finishes, but emissions in outdoor gear are typically minimal compared to apparel worn directly against skin.

None known

Azo dyes

No public record of azo dye violations in Columbia outdoor textiles. Color fastness in ripstop backpacks is generally good, and restricted azo dyes are widely avoided by major brands due to regulatory pressure in the EU and North America.

Possible

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication hazards

Over time, water-repellent coating wears away naturally from friction and washing. Some aftermarket water-repellent coating sprays and re-coating products contain high PFAS concentrations; if the backpack is later re-treated by consumers using unvetted products, secondary PFAS exposure is possible. Manufacturer re-coating (if available) would be safer than DIY alternatives.

None known

Microplastic shedding

Ripstop nylon is a dense, stable weave not known to shed microplastics during normal use or washing at rates that raise health concern. The coating itself does not generate microplastics; only degradation of the base fabric would pose this risk, which is extremely slow in quality ripstop.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Bags

Granite Gear Wrought Iron Food Pack

Granite Gear

Wrought Iron Food Pack

nylon fabric pack, likely uncoated or minimally treated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Food pack likely lower concern; confirm no water-repellent coating with brand.

Risky category by default

More waterproof outdoor bags grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.