45/ 100
F

PFAS score

collonil Leather Gel Repels Dirt Waterproof Revives Shoes Handbags

Collonil · Leather Conditioner

collonil Leather Gel Repels Dirt Waterproof Revives Shoes Handbags

F · High PFAS

Skip until Collonil discloses coating chemistry or provides third-party PFAS testing.

Collonil's Leather Gel is marketed as waterproof and dirt-repelling, but the brand does not disclose the chemical composition of its proprietary gel coating. Water- and stain-repellent treatments on leather historically often contain PFAS; without transparency or independent testing, the PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.

The safe swap

The Collonil Organic Protect and Care

Collonil

The Collonil Organic Protect and Care

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Proprietary leather gel coating (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

Hurts the grade

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Leather Conditioner

The Collonil Organic Protect and Care

Collonil

The Collonil Organic Protect and Care

Organic wax/oil blend; plant-based protectant

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern choice; organic formula claim credible, but no third-party verification of PFAS-free status.

Risky category by default

(Official) Grant Stone | Saphir Renovateur

Renovateur

(Official) Grant Stone | Saphir Renovateur

Leather conditioner/cream (wax and oil based)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, traditional leather cream with no known fluorochemical additives, but no explicit disclosure.

Naturally PFAS-free material

Herman Survivors Beeswax Leather Protector

Beeswax Polish

Herman Survivors Beeswax Leather Protector

beeswax-based leather polish

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower PFAS concern; traditional beeswax formulations rarely contain intentional fluorochemicals.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More leather conditioner grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.