20/ 100
F
OverallF4/100
FootJoy Men's WeatherSof Golf Gloves

Cleveland Golf · Golf Balls & Golf Gloves

FootJoy Men's WeatherSof Golf Gloves

F · High PFAS

Water-resistant leather gloves. water-repellent coating treatment PFAS risk unclear.

Verdict: SkipLeather glove with undisclosed water-resistant treatment; PFAS risk unclear but plausible; no major brand red flags on other hazard classes.

FootJoy golf gloves use treated leather for water resistance. Brand does not disclose PFAS or water-repellent coating chemistry, raising moderate concern for fluorinated water-repellents common in performance apparel.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy WeatherSof gloves are constructed from leather (likely sheepskin or goat leather common in golf gloves) with a water-resistant topical treatment applied to the surface. The treatment chemistry is proprietary and not disclosed on public product labels or spec sheets. Leather itself is generally low-hazard for textiles, but the water-resistant (water-repellent coating) finish is where chemical concern arises: these treatments historically relied on PFAS compounds, though some manufacturers have shifted to non-fluorinated alternatives without clear labeling.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (owned by Acushnet Holdings) has not published a dedicated PFAS transparency statement or phase-out commitment visible in public records as of available information. Cleveland Golf, the parent brand context you provided, shows no established public position on PFAS in leather goods or apparel. Neither brand has faced documented major recalls or regulatory action specifically tied to hazardous textile treatments in golf gloves. The silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is the main disclosure gap.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves as a category are lower-hazard than many textiles because they contact skin intermittently and briefly, and are typically not washed frequently at high temperatures. Leather gloves inherently avoid synthetic fiber issues (azo dyes, antimony in polyester). However, water-resistant leather gloves sit in a middle tier: they avoid the worst hazards of synthetic activewear but carry the water-repellent coating chemistry uncertainty that untreated leather or synthetic alternatives with transparent non-PFAS finishes do not. Many competitors (e.g., Titleist, Ping) also do not disclose water-repellent coating treatment chemistry.

If you buy it

Wash gloves in cool water with mild soap; avoid hot water or machine washing, which can degrade the water-resistant coating and potentially mobilize residual finish chemicals. Air-dry only; do not use heat (dryers, direct sunlight for extended periods). Replace when the leather shows visible cracking, stiffness, or loss of grip, typically after 1-2 seasons of moderate use. Store in a dry location away from direct heat to preserve both leather integrity and coating stability.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

PFAS in water-resistant (water-repellent coating) treatment

Leather water-repellent coating finishes may contain PFAS compounds depending on manufacturer formulation. FootJoy has not publicly disclosed whether this product uses PFAS-free alternatives. Risk is inhalation during application/manufacturing (primarily occupational) or potential skin contact with residual finish; consumer exposure is likely low given intermittent skin contact and no heating, but is not ruled out.

Possible

Formaldehyde in leather tanning/finishing resins

Leather manufacturing often involves formaldehyde-based resins in tanning and finishing processes. No specific test data is publicly available for FootJoy WeatherSof gloves. Formaldehyde off-gassing from finished leather is typically minimal compared to synthetic textiles, especially for outdoor sports gloves with minimal dyes.

None known

Azo dyes and heavy metals in pigments

Leather gloves typically use aniline or vegetable-based dyes rather than problematic azo compounds. No recalls or testing data link FootJoy golf gloves to azo dye or heavy metal pigment contamination. This hazard class is lower concern for leather than for synthetic textiles.

Possible

Coating degradation and chemical mobilization over time

As the water-resistant treatment wears (normal with use and washing), residual chemicals in the coating may leach slightly into sweat or become airborne during handling. The rate and degree depend on treatment formulation and durability; no quantified data exists for this specific product, but the risk increases with age and use.

Possible

Allergens from leather processing or treatment additives

Individuals with sensitive skin or latex-adjacent allergies may react to residual tanning agents, dyes, or finish additives. FootJoy does not provide allergen or processing-chemical disclosure. Risk is low for most users but not negligible for those with documented leather sensitivity.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Golf Balls & Golf Gloves

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

D
D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Risky category by default

Bridgestone Soft Grip Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Soft Grip Golf Glove

Leather, synthetic grip material, textiles

D
D · Elevated

Lower concern. Golf glove without known waterproofing or Teflon-family coating treatment.

Risky category by default

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

D
D · Elevated

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Risky category by default

More golf balls & golf gloves grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.