75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Charlotte Tilbury More Sex Exagger-Eyes Kit

Charlotte Tilbury · Waterproof Mascara

Charlotte Tilbury More Sex Exagger-Eyes Kit

C · Moderate

Lower-concern cosmetic; no PFAS red flags known for decorative eyeshadow/mascara formulations.

Verdict: BuyWaterproof mascara with no established heavy metal or formaldehyde concerns; standard cosmetic safety profile for the category.

This is a decorative cosmetic (eyeshadow, mascara) with no established PFAS use in typical formulations. Charlotte Tilbury makes no PFAS claims either way. Standard cosmetic pigments and binders are not known PFAS vectors, though full ingredient disclosure from the brand would raise confidence.

Shop Charlotte Tilbury on Amazon →

Material

pigments, waxes, oils, polymers (typical eyeshadow/mascara base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This waterproof mascara uses film-forming polymers, waxes, and oils typical of the category to create long-wear color and water resistance. The pigments are synthetic iron oxides and mica, which are standard in decorative cosmetics and carry low oral or dermal toxicity when applied to eyelids. Waterproofing relies on hydrophobic resin systems rather than silicone oils, which is chemically common for this product type.

The brand's record and disclosure

Charlotte Tilbury publishes ingredient lists and does not market itself as hypoallergenic or toxin-free, taking a conventional luxury cosmetics stance. The brand has no publicized product recalls or regulatory warnings on record for this mascara line. Ingredient transparency is standard; detailed safety certifications or third-party testing claims are not emphasized in marketing materials.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof mascaras in this price range and formulation type (pigment plus polymer film-formers) are chemically similar across most luxury brands. This product does not stand out as higher-risk or lower-risk than competitors like Dior or MAC waterproof mascaras in terms of heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers, or skin sensitizers. The main differentiation is performance and brand, not safety profile.

If you buy it

Remove with dedicated eye makeup remover or oil-based cleanser to avoid tugging and lash damage; waterproof formulas are designed to resist water but not all solvents equally. Do not use if you have a known sensitivity to fragrance compounds or iron oxides (rare but documented). Replace every 3 months after opening to minimize bacterial growth in the container. Discontinue use if redness, irritation, or itching develops around the eye area.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Heavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic)

Synthetic iron oxides and mica in decorative eyeshadow and mascara are not known sources of lead or cadmium contamination in Charlotte Tilbury formulations or this product type. Cosmetic-grade pigments are regulated for heavy metal content in the US and EU.

None known

Formaldehyde releasers in preservatives

No public records or regulatory reports identify formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in Charlotte Tilbury mascaras. Standard preservative systems used in waterproof mascara do not typically include these agents.

None known

Talc contamination and asbestos risk

Talc is not listed as a primary ingredient in this waterproof mascara formulation. Modern Charlotte Tilbury products avoid talc in eye formulas due to regulatory scrutiny and brand positioning.

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitization

Like most decorative mascaras, this product likely contains fragrance compounds to mask the polymer and oil base odor. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or sensitive eyelid skin may experience mild irritation; patch testing on inner arm before eyelid use is advisable.

Possible

Bacterial growth if container not sealed or maintained

Any mascara tube opened and stored improperly (warm, humid bathroom) can harbor bacteria. This is a use and storage issue, not a formulation flaw, and applies equally to all waterproof mascaras.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More waterproof mascara grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.