30/ 100
F
OverallF18/100
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Setting Spray Matte & Mini Duo

Charlotte Tilbury · Beauty Primers & Setting Sprays

Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Setting Spray Matte & Mini Duo

F · High PFAS

Waterproof cosmetic spray; PFAS risk unclear without ingredient disclosure.

Verdict: SkipSilicone-polymer spray with undisclosed PFAS risk and standard cosmetic allergen concerns; use sparingly, avoid inhalation, seek ingredient list before purchase if sensitive to fragrance or talc.

Setting sprays often contain water-resistant polymers that may include PFAS, though not always. Charlotte Tilbury does not disclose PFAS status or ingredients in detail publicly, limiting assessment certainty.

The safe swap

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

75/100 safety

C

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid spray formulation with silicones and polymers

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This is a liquid silicone and polymer-based setting spray designed to lock makeup in place. The formulation relies on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as propellants and solvents, plus film-forming polymers and silicones that create a breathable veil over skin. Waterproof cosmetic sprays in this class often contain siloxanes and acrylate polymers, which are generally recognized as safe for skin contact but carry inhalation risk if atomized repeatedly in poorly ventilated spaces. The matte finish suggests matting agents such as talc, silica, or iron oxides, which can vary in purity and contamination risk depending on sourcing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Charlotte Tilbury does not publicly disclose full ingredient lists on product pages for this spray, only partial INCI nomenclature in some markets. The brand has no published commitment to PFAS avoidance, heavy metal testing, or third-party safety certification (e.g., EWG verification, COSMOS). No recalls of this specific product are on record with FDA or EU authorities as of public data. The brand's parent company (Estée Lauder) has faced scrutiny over transparency in cosmetic ingredient sourcing but has not issued brand-specific statements on 'forever chemicals' in setting sprays.

How it compares in its category

Setting sprays occupy a mid-to-premium tier in cosmetics safety, as they involve inhalation exposure that foundation or powder do not. Charlotte Tilbury's spray is positioned above drugstore alternatives (e.g., NYX, Morphe) in price but offers no transparency advantage; indie brands (e.g., Tatcha) and mass-market options (e.g., MAC Fix+) publish fuller ingredient lists. Most competitors in this class share the same silicone and polymer base chemistry, so hazard profile is broadly similar; differentiation lies in brand willingness to disclose fragrance allergens and test for heavy metals in pigments.

If you buy it

Use in well-ventilated spaces to avoid inhaling atomized particles; do not spray directly into eyes or mouth. Replace if the nozzle becomes clogged or the spray pattern becomes uneven, as this may indicate solvent evaporation or mold growth in the atomizer. Perform a patch test on the inner wrist 24 hours before full face application to screen for fragrance sensitivity or contact dermatitis. Store upright at room temperature away from heat and direct sunlight, and discard 6-12 months after opening or if the product separates or smells rancid.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and fragrance-related contact dermatitis

Charlotte Tilbury setting sprays are lightly fragranced; full fragrance ingredients are not disclosed on standard product labeling. Consumers with sensitivity to cinnamaldehyde, limonene, or other common spray fragrance components may experience skin irritation or allergic sensitization with repeated use.

Possible

Inhalation risk from VOC propellants and atomized particles

Spray formulations release volatile organic compounds (likely dimethyl ether or hydrocarbons) and fine silicone/polymer mist into the air. Chronic inhalation in unventilated bathrooms or prolonged daily use may irritate respiratory mucosa; risk is low for occasional use but increases with frequency and poor air exchange.

None known

Talc contamination with asbestos or heavy metals

If the matte finish contains talc as a matting agent, risk of asbestos or lead contamination depends on supplier sourcing. No public testing or recalls of this product for talc-related contamination have been published; Charlotte Tilbury does not disclose talc sourcing or third-party purity testing.

Possible

Silicone and polymer buildup on skin and in pores

Repeated use of silicone-based sprays without thorough cleansing can lead to accumulation of polymeric residue in pores, potentially exacerbating acne or trapping bacteria. Skin type (oily, acne-prone) and cleansing habits determine risk; users should verify all spray residue is removed with water and mild cleanser.

None known

Heavy metals in pigments or iron oxide colorants

Matte sprays often contain iron oxides or mica for opacity; typical regulatory limits prevent lead or cadmium contamination in cosmetic-grade colorants. No third-party testing of Charlotte Tilbury sprays for heavy metal content is publicly available, and the brand does not publish supplier certifications.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 42% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Beauty Primers & Setting Sprays

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

liquid spray formulation, water and glycerin base

C
D
PFASAll
C · Moderate2 flags

Lower concern. Spray cosmetic with no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Estee Lauder The Smoother Universal Perfecting Primer

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder The Smoother Universal Perfecting Primer

Silicone, glycerin, water, pigments

C
D
PFASAll
C · Moderate2 flags

Liquid cosmetic primer with lower PFAS concern, no red flags identified.

Risky category by default

Estee Lauder The Mattifier Shine Control Perfecting Primer and Finisher

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder The Mattifier Shine Control Perfecting Primer and Finisher

silicones, talc, pigments, waxes

C
C
PFASAll
C · Moderate1 flag

Lower concern; cosmetic primer with no known PFAS-prone ingredients.

Risky category by default

More beauty primers & setting sprays grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.