Cetaphil Pro · Body Wash
Cetaphil Moisturizing Relief Body Wash
Lower concern; typical rinse-off body wash unlikely to contain intentional PFAS, but brand offers no transparency.
Cetaphil Moisturizing Relief Body Wash is a rinse-off liquid cleanser with no known PFAS-bearing materials (no waterproofing, nonstick, or grease resistance required). The brand makes no PFAS claims or disclosures, which is typical for this category.
Shop Cetaphil Pro on Amazon →Material
aqueous liquid cleanser (water, surfactants, humectants, preservatives)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Cetaphil Moisturizing Relief Body Wash is an aqueous liquid formulation combining water, mild surfactants (cleaning agents), humectants like glycerin (to retain skin moisture), and preservatives to prevent microbial growth. The aqueous base means most ingredients rinse away during use, reducing systemic exposure compared to leave-on products like creams or lotions. This product is specifically formulated for sensitive or compromised skin, so surfactant selection and preservative safety are primary concerns in the formulation.
The brand's record and disclosure
Cetaphil (owned by Galderma) markets itself as a dermatologist-recommended line for sensitive skin and does not publicly commit to PFAS-free formulations or provide ingredient-level transparency beyond standard labeling. The brand has no major safety recalls or controversies documented for this body wash product. Cetaphil does not carry third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, MADE SAFE) that would signal extra scrutiny, though absence of certification does not indicate a problem.
How it compares in its category
Cetaphil Moisturizing Relief sits in the mass-market sensitive-skin segment, competing with CeraVe, Eucerin, and Vanicream. Unlike some mass-market body washes, Cetaphil avoids dyes and perfume, reducing allergen triggers. It is formulated without sulfates (SLS/SLES), which is standard for sensitive-skin labels; many cheaper alternatives still contain sulfates and are more likely to strip skin. The rinse-off format is inherently lower-risk than leave-on moisturizers or cosmetics that contact skin longer.
If you buy it
Use as directed on damp skin, rinse thoroughly with water, and store in a cool, dry place to prevent preservative breakdown. Do not ingest or apply to broken skin without medical guidance. Once opened, typical shelf life is 12-24 months; discard if separation, odor, or visible mold appears (sign of preservative failure). For persons with known fragrance or preservative sensitivities, patch-test on a small area first, though this formulation is designed to minimize such reactions.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Preservative contact allergens
Body washes require preservatives (commonly phenoxyethanol, methylisothiazolinone, or paraben blends) to prevent bacterial and fungal growth. While these are approved for rinse-off use at permitted concentrations, a small fraction of sensitive individuals may react; Cetaphil does not disclose its specific preservative on the product label, limiting individual risk assessment.
Fragrance allergens (if present)
Cetaphil Moisturizing Relief is marketed as fragrance-free, which eliminates one major category of contact allergens common in body washes. No fragrance-related complaints or recalls are on record for this product.
Heavy metals in humectants or water
Rinse-off body washes are not typically a route of significant heavy metal exposure; water quality and raw material sourcing standards for major brands minimize contamination risk. No documented heavy metal contamination has been reported for Cetaphil products.
Microplastics or plastic microbeads
Cetaphil Moisturizing Relief is a liquid cleanser without reported microplastics or exfoliating beads. The product formula does not contain intentional solid plastic particles.
1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)
Surfactants used in body washes (especially ethoxylated surfactants) may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of synthesis. Rinse-off products present lower exposure than leave-on cosmetics, but Cetaphil does not publicly test for or disclose 1,4-dioxane levels, and no independent testing of this product is publicly available.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Body Wash
Cetyl
Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap
saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings
Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Dr. Bronner's
Pure-Castile Liquid Soap
Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments
Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.
⚠Risky category by default
Dr. Bronner's
Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap
Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)
Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.
⚠Risky category by default
More body wash grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.