25/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
El Sabor Foodservice Wrap 504 g 15cm

Cava · Fast-Casual Food Packaging

El Sabor Foodservice Wrap 504 g 15cm

F · High PFAS

Skip. Foodservice wrap likely contains grease-resistant PFAS treatment.

Verdict: SkipFoodservice wrap almost certainly contains PFAS grease-resistant coating; brand silent on composition and sourcing transparency.

Foodservice wrap typically uses PFAS-based water and grease barriers. Cava provides no disclosure of coating chemistry or PFAS status, making risk assessment difficult for this category.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Paper or cellulose with likely water/grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

El Sabor Foodservice Wrap is a cellulose or paper-based roll designed for food contact, nearly always treated with a water and grease-resistant coating to repel oils and moisture. These coatings in foodservice wraps are historically formulated with PFAS chemicals (PFAS "forever chemicals") because fluorine's repellent properties are ideal for food contact applications. Cava has not publicly disclosed the specific coating chemistry of this product, leaving the type and concentration of any PFAS or alternatives unverified. Cellulose itself is food-safe, but the coating is the critical unknown.

The brand's record and disclosure

Cava is a fast-casual Mediterranean restaurant chain; there is no established public record of Cava publishing ingredient disclosure, material sourcing transparency, or PFAS policy for their foodservice packaging. The brand has not communicated whether this wrap uses legacy PFAS, newer fluorine-free alternatives, or uncoated cellulose. Absence of third-party certification (e.g., STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX, EU food packaging compliance statements) further limits independent verification. This silence is typical in foodservice supply chains but reflects minimal consumer-facing accountability.

How it compares in its category

Standard commercial foodservice wraps (poly-coated kraft, silicone-treated papers, or PFAS-coated cellulose) all carry similar or identical concerns; this product is not exceptional in risk within its category. Uncoated kraft or cellulose wraps are available as alternatives but lose grease resistance and moisture barriers, making them unsuitable for oily foods. Silicone-treated wraps are increasingly common as a PFAS substitute, though long-term safety data on silicone migration remains limited. Cava's lack of specification means consumers cannot assess whether this wrap uses PFAS or a newer alternative.

If you buy it

Use this wrap only for room-temperature or cool food storage; do not use for hot foods or near direct heat, as thermal stress may increase coating migration. Replace the roll if the coating visibly peels, tears, or becomes sticky, which signals degradation. Do not reuse or compost this product; standard disposal is preferable. Request ingredient disclosure from Cava or supplier before large-scale purchase if PFAS exposure is a concern for your operation.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

PFAS in grease-resistant coating

Foodservice wrap of this type historically uses Teflon-family coating or PFAS-based repellent coatings; Cava has not disclosed composition, making PFAS presence probable based on industry standard. See separate PFAS grade (25/100).

Possible

Coating migration into fatty foods

Polymer or PFAS coatings can leach into high-fat foods (oils, butter, cheese, meat) under normal use, especially if coating is worn or heated. Extent and safety depend on coating chemistry, which is undisclosed.

Possible

Microplastic shedding if coating degrades

If the cellulose base or coating deteriorates with age or thermal stress, small particles may shed into food. Risk increases if wrap is stored in warm, humid conditions or reused.

None known

Ink or printing residue contamination

No public record of lead, cadmium, or heavy metals in El Sabor branding inks. Standard food-contact inks are regulated, but verification is not available from the brand.

None known

Bleaching agents or chlorine residues

Cellulose-based wraps may be chlorine-bleached during manufacture; no specific data on this product. Industry standard use of ECF (elemental chlorine-free) or TCF (totally chlorine-free) processes is common but unconfirmed here.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

More fast-casual food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.