Case-Mate · Waterproof Phone & Tech Cases
Case Mate Waterproof Phone Case-Black & White
Unknown waterproof treatment; PFAS risk unclear without coating details.
Case-Mate does not disclose PFAS status or waterproof coating chemistry. Phone cases often use water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS, but specifics unavailable for this model.
The safe swap
Spigen Tough Armor
iPhone 17 Series Tough Armor T AI MagFit Case
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its B.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polycarbonate/thermoplastic with waterproof coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Case-Mate Waterproof Phone Case is constructed from polycarbonate, a hard, transparent thermoplastic, with an applied waterproof coating. Polycarbonate itself is stable under normal phone use conditions and does not leach BPA in typical scenarios since it is not food-contact. The waterproof coating is the unknown element: most phone case waterproof treatments use either silicone, urethane, or fluorinated polymer (Teflon-type coating-type) barriers, and the fluorinated options may contain PFAS compounds to achieve water repellency.
The brand's record and disclosure
Case-Mate does not publicly disclose material safety certifications, third-party chemical testing, or PFAS content in their waterproof phone cases. The brand has not issued statements addressing PFAS in their products or committed to phase-out timelines. No major recalls specific to chemical leaching have been documented for this product, but the lack of transparency on coating chemistry limits independent verification of safety claims.
How it compares in its category
Waterproof phone cases vary widely in coating technology. Some brands (notably a small segment) explicitly state non-fluorinated or PFAS-free waterproof treatments; Case-Mate does not. Most mainstream phone case manufacturers, including Otterbox and Spigen, similarly avoid disclosing PFAS status in waterproof models, making this a widespread category-level transparency gap rather than a Case-Mate-specific outlier.
If you buy it
Avoid prolonged skin contact with the exterior coating, particularly if you have sensitive skin or dermatitis. Do not expose the case to extreme heat (above 65 degrees Celsius) or direct sunlight for extended periods, as coating degradation can accelerate. Replace the case if visible cracks, peeling, or coating loss appear, as waterproof integrity is compromised. Clean with warm water and mild soap; avoid harsh chemicals or solvents that may degrade the coating.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Waterproof coating degradation and leaching
Polycarbonate-based phone cases with applied waterproof coatings can degrade over 1-2 years of use, particularly with heat, UV exposure, or frequent cleaning. As coating breaks down, microscopic fragments or coating constituents may leach into skin or sweat on hands; specific leachate identity depends on coating chemistry, which Case-Mate does not disclose.
PFAS in waterproof treatment
Fluorinated polymers and Teflon-type coating-based coatings used in waterproof phone cases frequently contain PFAS compounds. Case-Mate's silence on coating type and chemistry leaves PFAS presence unconfirmed but plausible; industry practice suggests risk warrants assumption of possible PFAS until proven otherwise.
Polycarbonate base stability under typical use
Polycarbonate itself does not present established leaching hazards during normal phone case use at room temperature. No documented recalls or adverse events tied to polycarbonate phone cases leaching harmful chemicals in this product line or category.
Skin irritation from coating contact
Waterproof coatings, particularly if containing unreacted oligomers or uncrosslinked polymers, can occasionally trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive users. Case-Mate does not provide ingredient transparency, so individual sensitivity cannot be predicted; reactions are rare but not ruled out.
Microplastic shedding from coating wear
As the waterproof coating ages and flexes with phone use, microscopic polymer particles may shed into the environment or onto skin. Polycarbonate itself is durable, but applied coatings are typically thinner and more prone to fragmentation over time.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Phone & Tech Cases
Spigen Tough Armor
iPhone 17 Series Tough Armor T AI MagFit Case
Polycarbonate and TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane)
No PFAS risk signals detected in this rigid plastic case.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Spigen Tough Armor
Samsung Galaxy S24
Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and polycarbonate (PC)
Lower concern. Phone case, not high-risk product category.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Spigen Tough Armor
Spigen Galaxy S23 Series Case Tough Armor
Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and polycarbonate blend
Lower concern; no known PFAS-prone materials or treatments identified.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More waterproof phone & tech cases grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.