Carhartt · Waterproof Outdoor Accessories
Carhartt Men's Midweight Waterproof Rain Jacket
Waterproof apparel with undisclosed water-repellent coating, PFAS risk unclear.
Carhartt does not publicly disclose water-repellent coating treatment chemistry for this jacket. Waterproof coatings often contain PFAS, but brand silence prevents confirmation. No third-party testing located.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Cotton/polyester blend with water-repellent coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This jacket is a cotton-polyester blend (typical 60/40 or similar) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the shell. Cotton itself is inert and low-risk; polyester is stable when used in apparel. The water-repellent coating is the concern: traditionally these relied on PFAS chemistry (perfluorinated compounds), though some manufacturers now use fluorine-free or alternative hydrophobic treatments. Carhartt has not publicly disclosed which water-repellent coating chemistry is used in this model, making full hazard assessment impossible.
The brand's record and disclosure
Carhartt is a long-established workwear brand with no major recalls or safety violations on record for apparel. However, the company has not published a PFAS policy, sustainability report, or material transparency statement. Unlike brands such as Patagonia or The North Face, which have committed to PFAS phase-out timelines, Carhartt remains silent on water-repellent coating chemistry. This silence does not indicate a problem but reflects lower disclosure standards than industry leaders in technical apparel.
How it compares in its category
Midweight rain jackets in the workwear category typically use either PFAS-based water-repellent coating (older, more durable) or fluorine-free alternatives (newer, less established durability). Carhartt sits in a middle market position: higher quality than discount brands, but without the transparency or certified low-PFAS options offered by premium outdoor brands. Functionally, the cotton-poly blend is standard and reliable; the hidden variable is the water-repellent coating chemistry and its persistence.
If you buy it
Wash separately from other clothes on gentle cycles with cool water; avoid dry cleaning (solvents can strip and concentrate water-repellent coating residue). Do not bleach, iron at high heat, or use fabric softeners, as these degrade water repellency and may interact with water-repellent coating compounds. Replace when seams leak or coating visibly flakes or peels. Store dry; if mildew forms, wash promptly rather than treating with mold inhibitors. Expect effective waterproofing for 2-3 years under normal use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
water-repellent coating chemistry (PFAS or alternative, undisclosed)
Carhartt does not specify whether this jacket uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating, newer fluorine-free water-repellent coating, or hybrid technology. PFAS risk exists but cannot be quantified without material data. Fluorine-free alternatives carry lower persistent hazard but may shed microparticles during washing.
Polyester fiber shedding and microplastics
Polyester-blend textiles release microfibers when laundered, particularly in the first 5-10 washes. The water-repellent coating may increase shedding if it flakes. Shed fibers enter wastewater; health impact to wearers is negligible but environmental persistence is established.
Formaldehyde resins in finishing treatments
Cotton-polyester blends often receive formaldehyde-based resin finishes (e.g., for shrink resistance, wrinkle resistance, or dye fixation). Carhartt does not disclose finish chemistry. Residual formaldehyde is typically low in finished apparel but may off-gas slightly, especially if unwashed or heated.
Azo dyes or heavy-metal pigments
No recalls or warnings specific to Carhartt jackets for restricted azo dyes or cadmium/lead in dyes exist on public record. The brand sources from established mills with standard compliance. Risk is low for this category and price point.
Coating degradation and leachate over time
As water-repellent coating ages and breaks down with UV exposure and washing, degraded particles or residual finish chemistry may mobilize. Long-term leaching is not quantified, but wearing a heavily degraded jacket increases potential skin contact with coating remnants.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Waterproof Outdoor Accessories
Sea to Summit
Ultra- Sil Stuff Sack Set
Ultra-Sil nylon fabric, no water treatment applied
Stuff sack with no waterproofing treatment.
⚠Risky category by default
Arc'teryx
Index Gear Organizer
Nylon or polyester fabric organizer
Minimal PFAS risk likely, but Arc'teryx provides no public disclosure.
⚠Risky category by default
Sea to Summit
Ultra-Sil Pack Cover
nylon with silicone water-repellent coating
PFC-free claim stated. No independent verification available yet.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
More waterproof outdoor accessories grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.