20/ 100
F
OverallF12/100
Carhartt Men's Force 1/4-Zip Long Sleeve T-Shirt

Carhartt · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Carhartt Men's Force 1/4-Zip Long Sleeve T-Shirt

F · High PFAS

Likely lower concern, but water-repellent coating finish composition unconfirmed.

Verdict: SkipCotton-blend workwear with moisture-wicking treatment; no formaldehyde resins, azo dyes, or heavy-metal contamination on record. PFAS in water-repellent coating finish unconfirmed but typical for this category.

Cotton-based workwear with moisture-wicking treatment; Carhartt discloses no PFAS details. water-repellent coating finishes may contain PFAS, but specific treatment unknown.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Carhartt Force uses a cotton-synthetic blend (typically polyester or nylon) with a moisture-wicking treatment applied to the surface. The blend provides durability and sweat management; the treatment is likely a hydrophobic finish, possibly containing PFAS-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) compounds, though Carhartt does not disclose composition. Cotton itself is low-risk; the synthetic portion and finish are the exposure vectors.

The brand's record and disclosure

Carhartt maintains a strong reputation in workwear but does not publicly commit to PFAS-free finishes or publish chemical inventories. The brand has no documented recalls or public health controversies linked to hazardous dyes, formaldehyde, or heavy metals in their apparel lines. Transparency on moisture-wicking chemistry remains absent from their public materials.

How it compares in its category

Carhartt Force sits in the mainstream workwear segment; moisture-wicking treatments are standard across this tier and almost universally involve fluorinated compounds or silicone-based alternatives. Competitors (Red Kap, Dickies) use similar finishing chemistry without disclosure. Higher-end outdoor brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) explicitly disclose and transition away from PFAS, making them alternatives if fluorinated finishes are a concern.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water to avoid damaging the moisture-wicking finish; avoid high heat and bleach. The water-repellent coating will degrade over 50-100 washes; reapplication products exist but may reintroduce PFAS. For sensitive skin or heavy sweat exposure in hot conditions, this finish may not off-gas significantly, but wear-testing data is not public. Replace when elasticity or moisture-wicking performance drops noticeably.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

None known

Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

No formaldehyde-based wrinkle or shrink-resist resins are standard in Carhartt workwear; moisture-wicking finishes typically do not employ formaldehyde chemistry. No recalls or third-party testing contradict this.

None known

Azo dyes and heavy metal contaminants

Carhartt sources from established North American and offshore manufacturers with standard dye-vetting practices. No color-bleeding or toxic-dye recalls exist on record for this product line. Heavy metals in pigments are not a documented risk for this brand.

Possible

Antimony in polyester

If the synthetic component uses polyester (common in blends), antimony oxide may be present as a catalyst; levels in finished textiles are generally below occupational exposure thresholds. Skin contact from wearing the garment poses negligible risk; concern is mainly during manufacturing and disposal.

None known

Flame retardant treatments

Carhartt Force is not marketed as flame-resistant and does not appear to employ brominated or other chemical flame retardants. Workwear for non-hazmat roles typically avoids these additives.

Possible

VOC and odor off-gassing from synthetic finish

Moisture-wicking and water-repellent coating treatments may release volatile organic compounds (likely hydrofluorocarbons or siloxanes) initially, especially when new. Off-gassing is typically mild and subsides within 1-2 washes; no documented health complaints specific to Carhartt Force exist.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Basic cotton tee, lower PFAS concern.

Risky category by default

Carhartt Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton, no water-repellent finish

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern; plain cotton tee with no known water-repellent coating treatment.

Risky category by default

Carhartt Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

100% cotton long-sleeve shirt

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern; bare cotton apparel with no added treatments.

Risky category by default

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.