Bumble and bumble · Shampoo
Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo
Lower concern; typical shampoo with no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no disclosure.
Bumble and Bumble's thickening shampoo is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no inherent product class risk (cookware nonstick coatings, water-repellent textiles, grease-resistant packaging) for PFAS. The brand does not publish PFAS claims or certifications. No public lab testing or recalls are documented.
Shop Bumble and bumble on Amazon →Material
aqueous shampoo liquid, standard cosmetic surfactants
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo is a water-based liquid formulation using common anionic and amphoteric surfactants to cleanse and condition hair. The 'thickening' claim typically relies on polymers and conditioning agents rather than harmful additives. No reported use of restricted heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers, or known carcinogenic dyes in this product line based on available ingredient disclosures.
The brand's record and disclosure
Bumble and bumble (owned by Estee Lauder) does not publish comprehensive chemical transparency reports or third-party certifications like EWG Verified or Clean Beauty certifications. The brand has no documented recalls or substantive safety controversies on public record for this shampoo. Ingredient lists are available via retailer websites and the brand site, but proactive disclosure of supply-chain testing or heavy-metal screening is absent.
How it compares in its category
This product sits in the premium mass-market shampoo tier, positioned above drugstore formulations but without the third-party verification sought by clean-beauty brands. Most mainstream shampoos use similar surfactant chemistries; the main differentiator here is price and marketing rather than demonstrably safer formulation. No evidence this shampoo is safer or less safe than comparable high-end brands like Olaplex or Kerastase.
If you buy it
Store away from direct heat and sunlight to prevent fragrance volatilization and preserve emulsion stability. Use as directed (typically coin-sized amount); oversaturation does not improve thickening claims and wastes product. Replace every 6-9 months or when efficacy declines; unopened bottles shelf-stable for 2-3 years. No special dermatological concerns for typical scalp use, though anyone with documented fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or request full ingredient breakdown.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)
Bumble and Bumble products use proprietary fragrance blends listed as 'fragrance' or 'parfum' on labels, concealing specific allergen content under trade-secret rules. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or documented reactions to cosmetic perfumes should request detailed fragrance breakdown or test on inner arm before use.
1,4-dioxane contamination (shampoo surfactant byproduct)
Standard aqueous shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as an unintended byproduct of ethoxylated surfactants during manufacturing. No specific testing data public for this product; risk is typical for conventional shampoos, not unique to this brand or formulation.
Heavy metals in colorants or preservatives
No recalls, regulatory actions, or credible reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo. Standard cosmetic ingredient limits apply and are enforced by FDA.
Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives
No evidence this product uses formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) based on available ingredient lists. Modern Estee Lauder formulations typically avoid these older preservative classes.
Scalp irritation from sulfate surfactants
If this product contains sodium lauryl sulfate or sodium laureth sulfate (common but not confirmed for this specific line), some users report scalp irritation with prolonged use. Check ingredient label; if sensitivity occurs, discontinue and switch to sulfate-free alternative.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Shampoo
Credo Beauty
Roz Salt Scalp Scrub
salt crystals, mineral-based scrub
Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Public Goods Shampoo Refill
aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo
Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Puracy
Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash
water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution
Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.
⚠Risky category by default
More shampoo grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.