Bumble and bumble · Conditioner
Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Conditioner
Lower-concern cosmetic; no PFAS red flags known, but brand makes no disclosure.
Bumble and bumble has not publicly disclosed PFAS presence or absence in this conditioner. As a rinse-off hair product without water-repellent, non-stick, or stain-resistant claims, it carries no typical PFAS-trigger features. No public lab data or certification exists; brand transparency on PFAS remains absent.
Shop Bumble and bumble on Amazon →Material
aqueous conditioner with polymers and silicones (typical formulation)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Conditioner is a water-based conditioner formulated with silicones (likely dimethicone or similar) and conditioning polymers to coat and volumize hair. The aqueous base means no volatile organic compounds typical of leave-on styling products, and silicones are largely inert once applied to hair. Polymers and thickeners are standard cosmetic ingredients not known to bioaccumulate or penetrate skin significantly.
The brand's record and disclosure
Bumble and Bumble (Estee Lauder-owned) does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or commitment to phase-out, which is typical for mainstream prestige haircare brands. The brand has no publicized recalls or major safety controversies on record for this product line. Ingredient lists are available on retailer sites and Bumble's website, though the brand does not independently certify for heavy metals, allergens, or contaminant screening as standard practice.
How it compares in its category
This product sits in the mainstream premium haircare category; its silicone-polymer formula is industry-standard for volumizing conditioners and carries no unusual hazard profile versus comparable brands (Pantene, Tresemmé, or salon brands like Olaplex). The main differentiation is price and marketing rather than safety. Consumers seeking allergen-free or heavy-metal-tested alternatives would need to pursue independent testing or certified organic/clean brands.
If you buy it
Use as a rinse-off product after shampooing; do not ingest or apply to broken skin. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent premature degradation of the silicone emulsion. Discontinue use if scalp irritation or allergic reaction develops (rare with this formula). Replace every 12 months once opened to minimize bacterial growth from standing water exposure.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Fragrance allergens and sensitizers
Bumble and Bumble formulations typically include fragrance blends; specific allergen disclosure (e.g. limonene, linalool, cinnamal) is not standardized on retail packaging. Individuals with fragrance sensitivities should verify the full ingredient list or conduct a patch test before full-scalp use.
Heavy metals in colorants or mineral pigments
No heavy metal contamination has been reported in this product or brand. Rinse-off conditioners are lower-risk than leave-on styling products or color treatments for metal accumulation, and the brand has not faced regulatory action for metal residues.
Formaldehyde releasers in preservatives
Mainstream conditioners may contain preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin or imidazolidinyl urea, both formaldehyde releasers; Bumble and Bumble does not publicly disclose preservative systems. Concentrations in rinse-off products are generally low and not regulated as a major concern by FDA, but sensitive individuals may react.
Silicone buildup and scalp irritation with chronic use
Silicones in this volumizing formula can accumulate on hair and scalp with heavy, long-term use if not removed by clarifying shampoos. This is a cosmetic concern (dull appearance, potential itch) rather than a toxicological hazard, but worth noting for sensitive scalp users.
Microplastic beads or exfoliants
This is a conditioner, not a scrub or exfoliant product; no solid microplastics are intentionally included. The formula contains dissolved or suspended polymers only.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
More conditioner grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.