75/ 100
C
OverallD67/100
Bumble and Bumble Curl Moisturizing Shampoo

Bumble and bumble · Shampoo

Bumble and Bumble Curl Moisturizing Shampoo

C · Moderate

Lower-concern category; no known PFAS drivers, but brand silence on formulation limits certainty.

Verdict: BuyStandard aqueous shampoo with no established hazards; PFAS profile lower-concern; suitable for routine use.

Bumble and Bumble Curl Moisturizing Shampoo is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no evident PFAS-prone features (no water resistance, nonstick, or stain-resistance claims). Standard shampoo formulations rarely require PFAS, though the brand does not publicly disclose detailed ingredients or PFAS status.

Shop Bumble and bumble on Amazon →

Material

aqueous shampoo base (surfactants, water, conditioning agents)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bumble and Bumble Curl Moisturizing Shampoo is an aqueous surfactant-based cleanser formulated for curly hair with conditioning polymers and humectants (likely glycerin or similar). The formulation contains no known volatile organic compounds that would off-gas after purchase, and standard shampoo bases do not concentrate heavy metals or toxins in the way leave-on cosmetics can. As a rinse-off product used briefly on skin and hair, dermal absorption risk is minimal compared to leave-on creams or powders.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and bumble (owned by Estée Lauder Companies) does not publicly disclose detailed PFAS policies or comprehensive ingredient safety certifications beyond standard cosmetic compliance. The brand maintains no known major product recalls or regulatory violations on record for this shampoo line. However, the parent company's silence on PFAS use in formulations is typical of the beauty industry and does not indicate a problem, merely a lack of transparency.

How it compares in its category

This shampoo sits in the mid to premium mass-market category; its safety profile is consistent with other rinse-off shampoos from major brands. It is not certified by third-party bodies (e.g., EWG, Cradle to Cradle, or clean beauty standards), which is standard for conventional salon shampoos. Compared to budget alternatives, formulation consistency is likely higher; compared to indie or certified-clean brands, ingredient transparency is lower but risk profile is not significantly different.

If you buy it

Use as directed: apply to wet hair, lather briefly, and rinse thoroughly. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve conditioning agents; most aqueous shampoos remain stable for 2-3 years unopened. If you experience scalp irritation or allergic reaction, discontinue immediately and consult a dermatologist. Replace every 6-12 months or when empty; there is no evidence of ingredient degradation that would trigger earlier replacement for unopened bottles.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens

Bumble and bumble products typically contain added fragrance for scent; while fragrance concentrations in rinse-off shampoos are lower than in perfumes, individuals with fragrance sensitivity or scalp sensitivity may experience contact irritation or allergic response.

None known

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives

No public records indicate use of formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) in this shampoo line; modern premium shampoos typically use safer alternatives, but full ingredient list is not independently verified.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants

Shampoos are rinse-off products and do not contain pigments or colorants that would concentrate lead or cadmium; this hazard class is irrelevant to aqueous shampoo formulations.

Possible

Scalp/eye irritation from surfactants

All surfactant-based shampoos carry low but real risk of eye or sensitive scalp irritation; this is inherent to the product category and not specific to Bumble and bumble, but individuals with eczema or very sensitive skin should patch-test.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern buy, salt scrub formulation carries minimal inherent PFAS risk.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower-concern shampoo refill; Puracy's MADE SAFE cert and no-PFAS positioning align, but cosmetic formulation labs are rarely published.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

Puracy

Natural Baby Shampoo Body Wash

water-based surfactants, plant-derived ingredients, aqueous solution

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, liquid cosmetic with no water-resistant or nonstick triggers.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.