20/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Brooks Women's Drive Interlace Run Bra

Brooks · Waterproof Sports & Performance Undergarments

Brooks Women's Drive Interlace Run Bra

F · High PFAS

Sports bra likely has water-repellent coating; Brooks silent on PFAS.

Verdict: SkipSports bra with likely PFAS-treated water-repellent coating finish and standard synthetic fiber hazards; acceptable with informed washing practices and replacement awareness.

Sports bras commonly use water-resistant treatments that may contain PFAS. Brooks does not publicly disclose PFAS avoidance or testing for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon, elastane, polyester with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This bra combines nylon and elastane (spandex) for stretch and support, with polyester in the outer shell, all treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings on athletic wear are typically fluorinated compounds applied to shed sweat and moisture. Nylon and polyester are petroleum-based synthetics that do not inherently leach chemicals under normal wear, but the applied finish and dyes used in construction are the primary chemical concern. Elastane in particular is prone to degradation with repeated washing and heat exposure, which can release fibers and potentially break down the material's structural polymers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Brooks does not publicly disclose PFAS use or non-use in their apparel line, nor do they appear to have committed to PFAS-free manufacturing as part of a formal sustainability statement. The company has not achieved independent third-party certifications (such as bluesign or OEKO-TEX Standard 100) that would rule out or limit restricted substances in this product. This silence is typical of mainstream athletic brands; absence of transparency does not confirm PFAS presence, but it reflects a lack of proactive chemical disclosure that some competitors provide.

How it compares in its category

Sports bras with synthetic water-repellent coating finishes are the industry standard; this product is not unusual in that respect. Some premium or eco-focused brands (e.g., Patagonia, Allbirds) have adopted PFC-free water repellency, but Brooks has not publicly committed to that transition. Most mass-market athletic brands fall into the same disclosure gap as Brooks, making this product typical rather than exceptional in chemical transparency. Performance and durability expectations are appropriate for the price point; chemical risk profile is not differentiated.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and air-dry; heat (dryer, hot water) accelerates elastane breakdown and may mobilize or degrade the water-repellent coating finish. Avoid chlorine-based detergents and fabric softeners, which can strip or interact with the water-repellent coating. Replace after 1-2 years of regular use or when elastic no longer provides firm support, as degraded elastane increases microfiber shedding. If concerned about PFAS exposure, consider contacting Brooks directly to request product-specific chemical data; consumer pressure has prompted some brands to disclose or reformulate.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Likely

water-repellent coating finish (likely fluorinated compounds, PFAS class)

Sports bras with water-repellent finishes typically use fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings during manufacturing. Brooks does not disclose the formulation, so presence of legacy PFAS or newer alternatives cannot be confirmed from public information. Wear and washing do not typically release significant quantities, but the material itself contains these compounds at manufacture.

Possible

Formaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes

Polyester and nylon in colored athletic wear may be treated with formaldehyde-releasing resins for dye fixation or shape retention. No public recall or testing specific to this product exists, but this is a known hazard in synthetic apparel; risk is low under normal wear and washing.

Possible

Azo dyes

Synthetic textiles often use azo dyes, some of which can break down into aromatic amines under certain conditions (acidic sweat, extended storage). No specific testing for this bra is available; industry compliance with OEKO-TEX or similar standards would exclude known carcinogenic azo dyes, but Brooks does not certify to these standards.

Reported

Elastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber shedding

Elastane fibers break down with repeated washing, heat exposure, and physical wear, releasing microfibers into wash water and potentially inhaled during handling. This is documented in technical textile literature; it affects all elastane-containing garments, including this bra. Regular machine washing and air-drying limit but do not eliminate this hazard.

None known

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyester manufacturing. No specific data or concerns for this product exist in public record; it is typically retained in the polymer matrix and does not migrate during normal wear, but is a theoretical concern with older polyester formulations.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports & Performance Undergarments

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated3 flags

Lower concern, no known PFAS triggers identified in basic apparel.

Risky category by default

Reebok Women's Seamless Hipster

Reebok

Women's Seamless Hipster

nylon/elastane blend, seamless knit

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated1 flag

Lower concern. Basic seamless intimate wear, no water-resistant coatings.

Risky category by default

Reebok Men's Featherweight Performance Boxer Briefs

Reebok

Men's Featherweight Performance Boxer Briefs

polyester and elastane blend

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; untreated synthetic fibers typical for boxer briefs.

Risky category by default

More waterproof sports & performance undergarments grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.