85/ 100
B
OverallD69/100
Maplus GM Med Block 20g

Briko-Maplus · Ski Wax

Maplus GM Med Block 20g

B · Low PFAS

Lower PFAS concern; wax-based glide product unlikely to contain fluorochemicals, but no public disclosure from brand.

Verdict: BuyWax-based glide product with no established safety recalls; lower PFAS risk profile; standard ski wax hazards manageable with basic care.

Maplus GM Med Block is a traditional paraffin-based ski wax designed for cold/medium conditions. The product category and material composition (hydrocarbon wax blend) do not typically require PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments. No public PFAS claims or third-party verification available; brand is silent on the topic.

Shop Briko-Maplus on Amazon →

Material

Wax-based ski/snowboard glide wax

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Maplus GM Med Block is a hydrocarbon-based paraffin wax formulated for mid-range snow temperatures. Ski waxes in this class are typically mineral or synthetic paraffin blends with additives for glide performance and durability. Unlike fluorinated waxes, paraffin-only products do not rely on Teflon-type coating or fluorochemicals to reduce friction, making them chemically simpler but generally requiring more frequent reapplication.

The brand's record and disclosure

Briko-Maplus is an established Italian ski wax manufacturer with decades of market presence, but maintains minimal public chemical disclosure or third-party certifications for individual products. No major safety recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this brand. The company has not publicly committed to PFAS elimination or published safety data sheets for consumer products, reflecting a common industry pattern for smaller wax makers.

How it compares in its category

Paraffin-based glide waxes like this occupy the middle ground: safer chemical profile than fluoro waxes, but less performance and durability. They are standard entry-level and recreational options. Premium brands (Swix, Toko) often disclose more; budget competitors rarely do either. This product is typical for its segment in transparency and hazard profile.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated space or outdoors, as heating wax releases minor VOCs and steam. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to prevent degradation and oil separation. Reapply every 3-5 days of skiing depending on snow conditions and friction. Use a dedicated wax scraper and avoid inhaling wax dust or fumes during application; keep away from children and pets during use.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and inhalation risk during application

Heating paraffin wax releases low levels of hydrocarbons and minor off-gassing. Risk is minimal with outdoor or well-ventilated application but may be meaningful in enclosed spaces, particularly with prolonged or repeated exposure.

None known

Heavy metals in wax additives or pigments

No recalls or public testing has identified heavy metal contamination in Maplus products. Hydrocarbon waxes rarely contain significant lead or cadmium, but manufacturer does not disclose additive composition.

Possible

Skin and eye irritation from direct contact

Molten wax can cause thermal burns; dried wax may irritate skin if worked in repeatedly. Minor irritant risk from dust or incompletely cooled product, especially for sensitive individuals.

Possible

Microplastic or mineral dust generation during scraping and storage

Repeated scraping and handling of wax blocks produces fine particulates. While not unique to this product, accumulation of wax dust can be inhaled if not applied outdoors or in dust-controlled spaces.

Possible

Storage degradation and oil separation over time

Paraffin-based waxes may separate or oxidize if stored in warm or humid conditions for extended periods, potentially altering performance and chemical stability. No known toxicity risk but loss of efficacy and possible rancidity.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Ski Wax

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

Start

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, non-fluoro wax avoids PFAS-laden fluorinated alternatives, but verify formulation transparency.

Risky category by default

Start Kick Wax Synthetic

Start

Kick Wax Synthetic

Synthetic hydrocarbon wax blend

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Synthetic ski wax lacks typical PFAS applications, but composition opacity warrants caution.

Risky category by default

Start Basewax

Start

Basewax

Wax-based product (beeswax, plant waxes, or mineral wax blend)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; wax-based products typically don't require PFAS, but verify ingredient list.

Risky category by default

More ski wax grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.