85/ 100
B
OverallC73/100
Maplus BP1 Cold Liquid Wax

Briko-Maplus · Ski Wax

Maplus BP1 Cold Liquid Wax

B · Low PFAS

Lower-concern wax product; no PFAS triggers identified, but manufacturer transparency is absent.

Verdict: BuyHydrocarbon liquid wax with no documented hazards; lower PFAS concern and no brand red flags on record make it a safe mainstream choice.

Maplus BP1 is a cold liquid wax for ski/board maintenance, a simple hydrocarbon-based formulation with no obvious nonstick, water-repellent treatment, or Teflon-family coating that would introduce PFAS. The brand makes no claims about PFAS either way. No public lab testing or third-party certification exists for this niche sports product.

Shop Briko-Maplus on Amazon →

Material

Hydrocarbon-based liquid wax

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Maplus BP1 is a hydrocarbon-based cold liquid wax, meaning its active ingredient is refined mineral oil and paraffin derivatives rather than synthetic fluorocarbons or exotic polymers. This formulation is designed to lower viscosity at cold temperatures so it spreads and bonds to ski bases without heating. Hydrocarbon waxes are inherently lower-risk than some alternatives because they lack the persistent chemical architecture that triggers bioaccumulation concerns in other product classes.

The brand's record and disclosure

Briko-Maplus is a long-established Italian ski-wax manufacturer with no publicly documented product recalls, safety violations, or formulation controversies in major consumer databases. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS content or publish third-party safety certifications for this product line, which is typical (though not ideal) for the ski-wax category. No evidence of ongoing litigation or regulatory action against the brand exists in available records.

How it compares in its category

Cold liquid waxes occupy a middle ground in ski-wax safety: they avoid the heating-and-fume profile of hot-iron paraffins, and they typically contain fewer additives than high-performance race waxes. Maplus BP1 is chemically simpler than graphite-enhanced or nano-particle waxes, reducing the risk of inhaled particulates. It sits squarely in the consumer-grade, non-specialized segment where hazard reports are rare.

If you buy it

Apply in a well-ventilated space; although cold liquid waxes produce minimal fume, inhalation of mineral-oil mist should be minimized over repeated exposure. Store away from heat and direct sunlight to prevent oxidation of the hydrocarbon base. Replace or reapply when base speed noticeably drops (typically 5-15 ski days, depending on snow conditions and frequency). Wash hands after application; avoid prolonged skin contact with undiluted product, though acute toxicity from dermal exposure is not documented.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Mineral oil / hydrocarbon volatility

Cold liquid waxes release low levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during application and early drying. Prolonged indoor use without ventilation may cause mild irritation; outdoor application on the slope carries negligible risk.

Possible

Skin irritation from undiluted liquid

Neat hydrocarbon oils can cause mild dermatitis with repeated or prolonged contact; risk is low during normal use but increases if product is rubbed into skin or left on hands for extended periods.

Possible

Aspiration hazard if ingested

Hydrocarbon liquid waxes are toxic if swallowed due to aspiration risk into the lungs, though accidental ingestion during normal ski-wax application is extremely unlikely in adult use.

None known

Additive composition opacity

Maplus does not publicly specify colorants, thickeners, or anti-oxidant additives in BP1. No reports of heavy metals, azo dyes, or endocrine disruptors have been documented for this product or brand line.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Ski Wax

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

Start

Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G

hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern, non-fluoro wax avoids PFAS-laden fluorinated alternatives, but verify formulation transparency.

Risky category by default

Start Kick Wax Synthetic

Start

Kick Wax Synthetic

Synthetic hydrocarbon wax blend

A
B
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower concern. Synthetic ski wax lacks typical PFAS applications, but composition opacity warrants caution.

Risky category by default

Start Basewax

Start

Basewax

Wax-based product (beeswax, plant waxes, or mineral wax blend)

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; wax-based products typically don't require PFAS, but verify ingredient list.

Risky category by default

More ski wax grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.