65/ 100
D

PFAS score

Bonobos Men's Textured Silk Tie

Bonobos · Neckties

Bonobos Men's Textured Silk Tie

D · Elevated

Lower PFAS concern; untreated silk tie unlikely to contain fluorochemicals.

Bonobos does not disclose PFAS use or avoidance for this product. Silk ties are typically untreated textiles without water-resistance or stain-resistance coatings, making PFAS exposure unlikely. No third-party testing or certifications are publicly documented for this item.

The safe swap

3-Pack Slim Tie Bar

Tie Bar

3-Pack Slim Tie Bar

75/100 safety

C

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

silk textile, natural fiber

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 78% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Neckties

3-Pack Slim Tie Bar

Tie Bar

3-Pack Slim Tie Bar

Metal alloy (likely zinc alloy or stainless steel)

C
F
PFASAll
C · Moderate3 flags

Lower PFAS concern; simple metal fastener with no functional coatings.

Risky category by default

More neckties grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.