75/ 100
C
OverallF53/100
Bobbi Brown Crushed Oil Infused Gloss

Bobbi Brown · Lip Gloss & Lip Balm

Bobbi Brown Crushed Oil Infused Gloss

C · Moderate

Lower PFAS concern for a cosmetic gloss without waterproofing claims, but brand transparency is absent.

Verdict: BuyOil-based gloss with no established safety issues; lower PFAS risk profile; brand lacks transparency but product chemistry is straightforward.

Bobbi Brown's Crushed Oil Infused Gloss is a decorative lip product formulated with oils and resins, materials not typically requiring PFAS chemistry. However, Bobbi Brown (Estée Lauder group) makes no public PFAS disclosure for cosmetics.

Shop Bobbi Brown on Amazon →

Material

Oil-infused gloss (oils, resins, pigments)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bobbi Brown Crushed Oil Infused Gloss is a leave-on lip product combining cosmetic oils, volatile resins, and pigments designed to deliver color and shine without waterproof claims. The oil base (typically jojoba, coconut, or mineral oils) is inherently stable and hydrolytic, meaning it does not readily break down or leach into saliva. Pigments in lip gloss are regulated as colorants (CI numbers) and are subject to FDA colour additive reviews; Bobbi Brown does not publicly disclose specific pigment sources or testing, but major brands typically source from compliant suppliers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bobbi Brown (Estee Lauder group) does not publish ingredient sourcing transparency, heavy metal testing reports, or PFAS reduction commitments specific to this product line. The brand has no publicly documented safety recalls or regulatory actions tied to this gloss. Estee Lauder corporate materials emphasize ingredient safety and regulatory compliance but do not provide product-level third-party certifications (e.g., Clean at Sephora, EWG Verified) for this item.

How it compares in its category

Oil-infused glosses are a mainstream category segment; they sit mid-range for hazard profile compared to waterproof/long-wear glosses (which may contain film-forming polymers and higher PFAS risk) and synthetic lip balms with added actives. Competitors like MAC Lip Glass and Charlotte Tilbury Lip Lustre use similar oil-base chemistries without documented safety incidents. Bobbi Brown's lack of public testing data is typical for prestige cosmetics, though some peer brands now voluntarily disclose heavy metal screening.

If you buy it

Apply only to lips; avoid contact with eyes and mucous membranes. Oil-based formulas can migrate or feel sticky in heat; store in cool conditions to preserve pigment stability and prevent rancidity. Replace after 12 months of regular use, as oils gradually oxidize and microbes can colonize if the cap is left unsealed. Do not share applicators with others to prevent microbial cross-contamination.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Heavy metals in synthetic pigments (cadmium, lead, antimony in colorants)

Lip glosses use FDA-approved synthetic colorants (CI numbers) that are tested for heavy metal content at the supplier level, but Bobbi Brown does not disclose third-party heavy metal assay data for finished products. Cadmium and lead are used in some yellow and red lake pigments; antimony in some polymeric pigments is less common in glosses but possible in glitter additives if present.

Possible

1,4-dioxane contamination (manufacturing byproduct in emulsifiers and surfactants)

Oil-infused glosses typically contain minimal surfactants, reducing 1,4-dioxane risk compared to water-based products, but any trace emulsifiers used during manufacturing may be contaminated. FDA does not require disclosure or testing for 1,4-dioxane in leave-on cosmetics; Bobbi Brown provides no data.

Reported

Fragrance allergens (cinnamates, geraniol, limonene) in essential oils or fragrance compou

Many Bobbi Brown glosses are lightly scented; fragrance allergens are common in prestige cosmetics and may trigger reactions in sensitive individuals. The brand does not list individual fragrance constituents, only 'fragrance' under INCI, which is permitted under trade secret rules.

Possible

Microbial growth (bacteria, mold) if applicator is contaminated or product is stored damp

Oil-based formulas resist microbial growth better than water-based products, but applicators that contact lips are a vector for pathogenic transfer if shared or stored unwashed. Bobbi Brown packaging does not include preservative data or applicator hygiene guidance.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers in preservative systems

Oil-infused glosses require minimal preservatives because water content is negligible; formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (DMDM hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) are uncommon in this product category and no evidence suggests Bobbi Brown uses them in this gloss.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Lip Gloss & Lip Balm

Estee Lauder Glossy Pout Tinted Lip Oil

Estée Lauder

Estee Lauder Glossy Pout Tinted Lip Oil

Oil base (likely mineral, plant, or synthetic esters); glass or plastic container

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern for typical lip oil; no waterproof treatment triggers detected.

Risky category by default

tarte Maracuja Juicy Lip Plump Shimmer Glass

Tarte

Maracuja Juicy Lip Plump Shimmer Glass

Glass container with cosmetic liquid formula (oils, silicones, pigments)

B
B
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern, glass lip plump is a straightforward cosmetic with no known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Armani Beauty Prisma Glass Lip Gloss

Armani Beauty

Prisma Glass Lip Gloss

Glass container; proprietary gloss formula (undisclosed composition)

B
C
PFASAll
B · Low PFAS2 flags

Lower concern; glass packaging itself is PFAS-safe, but gloss formula composition remains undisclosed.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

More lip gloss & lip balm grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.