Blue Tansy · Sunscreen
Acure Seriously Soothing SPF 30 Day Cream
Lower-concern cosmetic; no known PFAS triggers, but brand offers no transparency.
Acure's day cream is a leave-on cosmetic without obvious water-repelling or non-stick coatings typical of PFAS-containing products. The formula relies on common emulsifiers and botanicals rather than fluorinated polymers.
Shop Blue Tansy on Amazon →Material
water-based cream emulsion with mineral/botanical actives
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Acure Seriously Soothing SPF 30 is a water-based cream emulsion using mineral UV filters (likely zinc oxide or titanium dioxide) rather than chemical absorbers. Mineral sunscreens sit on skin rather than penetrating, reducing systemic absorption risk. The formula includes botanical extracts (blue tansy, sea fennel) and plant oils as soothing actives, which are low-toxicity ingredients but can cause contact sensitivity in individuals with specific allergies.
The brand's record and disclosure
Acure (owned by Unilever subsidiary Blissful Earth) markets itself as plant-derived and clean-ingredient focused but provides no public PFAS commitment or third-party certification. The brand has not faced major safety recalls on record. Ingredient transparency is moderate; the company lists components on packaging but does not publish independent safety testing or certifications (EWG, NSF, etc.).
How it compares in its category
Mineral sunscreens are generally regarded as safer than chemical UV filters for sensitive skin; this product positions itself in the mid-market natural segment alongside brands like Badger and Burt's Bees. It lacks reef-safe certification or explicit claims, which some competitors highlight. Price point and botanical positioning are typical for the clean beauty category rather than premium or clinical-grade sunscreens.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to preserve stability of botanical extracts. Patch test on inner arm or behind ear first if you have sensitive skin or known plant allergies (blue tansy can trigger contact dermatitis in rare cases). Use within 12 months of opening; cream emulsions degrade faster than gels. Reapply every 2 hours if sweating or swimming, as with any sunscreen.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Contact allergens (fragrance and botanical extracts)
Blue tansy and plant-derived soothing compounds carry low but non-zero risk of contact dermatitis or fragrance sensitivity, particularly in individuals with atopic skin. Unilever does not disclose specific fragrance composition (likely contains limonene or linalool from botanical sources).
Heavy metals in mineral UV filters
Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, when sourced and processed to cosmetic grade, do not accumulate in blood or organs from topical sunscreen use. No recalls or safety alerts exist for Acure products on this basis.
Talc or talc-like contamination
No evidence that this product contains talc. Mineral sunscreens sometimes use other inert powders (silica, mica) for texture; no contamination incidents are on record for this brand.
Formaldehyde releasers or preservative toxins
Acure does not publicly disclose full preservative systems; typical emulsion preservatives (methylisothiazolinone, phenoxyethanol) at cosmetic-grade concentrations pose minimal dermal risk. No safety alerts exist for this product line.
Photocatalytic degradation under UV (mineral sunscreen reliability)
Mineral sunscreens, especially uncoated zinc oxide, can gradually degrade in potency with repeated sun exposure and age. This affects SPF efficacy over time rather than creating a direct toxicity hazard, but consumers should replace annually or after heavy use.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Sunscreen
Goddess Garden
Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz
mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes
Lower-concern mineral sunscreen with credible PFAS-exclusion certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)
Lower PFAS concern; mineral sunscreen with third-party verification and no known fluorochemical history.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging
Lower-concern choice; mineral sunscreen + explicit PFAS-free positioning + third-party certs reduce risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More sunscreen grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.