75/ 100
C
OverallF61/100
Axe Apollo Body Wash

Axe · Body Wash

Axe Apollo Body Wash

C · Moderate

Lower-concern product; liquid body wash carries minimal PFAS risk but brand lacks transparency.

Verdict: BuyBody wash with minimal established safety concerns; PFAS risk is low for rinse-off product; no major brand recalls or ingredient controversies on record.

Axe Apollo Body Wash is a rinse-off liquid cosmetic with no known PFAS-prone ingredients (no waterproofing, grease-resistance, or non-stick coatings). Liquid soaps and body washes rarely require Teflon-family coating or water-repellent coating treatments.

Shop Axe on Amazon →

Material

aqueous surfactant formulation (liquid body wash)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Axe Apollo is an aqueous surfactant formulation, meaning water-based cleansers that remove oils from skin. Body washes in this category rely on synthetic surfactants (typically sodium lauryl sulfate or similar), which are regulated cosmetic ingredients with long safety histories. The product is designed to be rinsed away immediately, which eliminates the sustained-contact risk profile that applies to leave-on products like deodorants or creams. Fragrance compounds are included for scent appeal but are present in dilute form in a rinse-off vehicle.

The brand's record and disclosure

Axe (owned by Unilever) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, manufacturing certifications, or supply-chain transparency practices specific to this product line. The brand has no widely documented recalls or regulatory actions tied to Apollo body wash formulations. Axe does not hold third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Dermatologist Association endorsement) that would signal advanced ingredient vetting beyond regulatory minimums. Unilever as a parent company has faced historical scrutiny over microplastics in some personal-care lines, but body washes are generally exempt from that concern because they lack exfoliating particles.

How it compares in its category

Body washes are among the lowest-risk personal-care product types because they are dilute, rinse-off formulations with minimal skin residence time. Axe Apollo sits in the mainstream mass-market segment; it offers no special formulation claims (hypoallergenic, fragrance-free, paraben-free) that would differentiate it as safer or riskier than competitors like Dove, Old Spice, or store-brand equivalents. The ingredient profile is typical for synthetic surfactant-based products, meaning it is neither premium-tier (fewer synthetic chemicals) nor discount-tier (known for quality-control issues). Price and efficacy in this category are broadly comparable across brands.

If you buy it

Body wash requires no special storage or maintenance beyond keeping the bottle sealed and away from extreme heat. Use as directed: apply, lather, rinse thoroughly with water. No skin patch test is required for most users, but those with sensitive skin or known surfactant sensitivity should spot-test on a small area first. Rinse completely to avoid residue buildup; the product poses no risk from incomplete removal because it is designed to wash away entirely.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Axe Apollo is marketed for strong scent appeal; synthetic fragrance blends can trigger contact dermatitis or allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. Specific allergen compounds in this formulation are not disclosed publicly, so individual risk depends on personal sensitivity history.

None known

1,4-dioxane (synthetic fragrance contaminant)

1,4-dioxane is a potential impurity in surfactants and fragrance ingredients used in body washes. No testing data or regulatory findings specific to Axe Apollo have been published; the risk is theoretical for all mass-market body washes and generally considered minimal given rinse-off exposure.

Reported

Skin irritation from surfactant concentration

Sodium lauryl sulfate and related surfactants are known to cause mild irritation, dryness, or redness in some users, particularly with prolonged contact or overuse. Axe body wash is a rinse-off product, so irritation risk is lower than leave-on formulations, but some users report drying effects consistent with surfactant-based cleansers in this price tier.

None known

Formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers

Formaldehyde releasers are sometimes used as preservatives in personal-care products. No public testing or regulatory alert has identified this as a concern in Axe Apollo body wash; the product's short shelf life and rinse-off nature make preservative requirements modest.

None known

Heavy metals in colorants or pigments

Body wash formulations use FD&C-approved dyes and pigments at low concentrations. No contamination or excess heavy metal findings have been reported for Axe Apollo or similar mass-market body washes; regulatory oversight of colorant purity is routine in most markets.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Body Wash

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Cetyl

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

saponified vegetable oils (castile base), no protective coatings

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower-concern choice; simple castile soap formulation carries minimal PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

Dr. Bronner's Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Pure-Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils); no coatings or treatments

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, uncoated liquid soap with no water- or stain-resistant treatments.

Risky category by default

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Dr. Bronner's

Dr Bronner's Baby Unscented Pure Castile Liquid Soap

Plant-based soap (coconut, olive, palm oils)

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS3 flags

Lower PFAS concern, pure castile liquid soap has no typical vector for forever chemicals.

Risky category by default

More body wash grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.