65/ 100
D
OverallF43/100
ASICS Icon Shorts Men

Asics · Waterproof Sports Gear

ASICS Icon Shorts Men

D · Elevated

Lower concern shorts; no high-risk coatings identified.

Verdict: SkipPolyester/nylon athletic shorts with no established chemical hazards; standard brand disclosure; lower PFAS concern suitable for regular wear.

ASICS Icon Shorts use standard polyester/nylon fabric without noted water-resistant or stain-guard treatments. No PFAS disclosure from brand, but fabric base materials carry lower inherent risk than treated performance apparel.

The safe swap

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

100/100 safety

A

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon blend athletic fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

Helps the grade

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

ASICS Icon Shorts are constructed from a polyester/nylon blend, a common base for athletic wear because it wicks moisture, resists wrinkles, and tolerates frequent washing. Polyester fibers themselves are chemically stable during wear and skin contact. The concern in blended synthetics is not the fiber cores but dyes, finishes, and treatments applied during manufacturing, particularly azo dyes and antimony catalysts in polyester production, as well as formaldehyde-based resins used to set colors and improve wrinkle resistance.

The brand's record and disclosure

ASICS has not published extensive chemical disclosure statements comparable to leading sustainability-focused brands, and takes a notably silent stance on PFAS use in apparel. The company does maintain some environmental commitments and has not faced major chemical recall incidents in recent years on clothing products. However, the lack of transparency on manufacturing processes and chemical inputs means consumers cannot independently verify whether specific treatments like formaldehyde finishes or azo dyes are used in this line. ASICS shorts are produced under standard industry practices without known proprietary hazard-reduction protocols.

How it compares in its category

Men's athletic shorts in this price range (typically $40-80) overwhelmingly use polyester blends and follow similar dyeing and finishing protocols as ASICS. Branded athletic wear rarely discloses anti-wrinkle or color-set chemistry; independent testing of multiple brands shows formaldehyde residues are common but usually below regulatory limits in finished apparel. ASICS Icon Shorts occupy the middle of the transparency spectrum: less transparent than certified organic cotton lines, but no worse than Nike, Adidas, or Underarmour peers in chemical disclosure.

If you buy it

Wash new shorts before first wear in cool water to reduce potential formaldehyde or dye residue. Polyester/nylon blends tolerate hot water and machine drying without degradation, unlike some specialty fabrics, but cold or warm wash extends dye fastness and reduces fading. Do not store damp or compressed for extended periods, as synthetic fibers can trap odor and mildew rather than shed them like natural fibers. Replace when elastic waistbands lose function or seams fray; synthetic blends do not biodegrade, so worn-out items should be donated or recycled if programs are available.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Formaldehyde resins (color setting and wrinkle resistance)

ASICS does not disclose whether Icon Shorts use formaldehyde-based finishes. Most mass-market polyester athletic shorts do; residues typically diminish after one to three washes but can exceed safe limits in sensitive individuals if not pre-washed. No recall or violation on record for this specific line.

Possible

Azo dyes and non-carcinogenic azo intermediates

Polyester dyeing routinely uses azo dyes, which are regulated but not banned in most markets. Restricted azo dyes (those converting to carcinogenic amines) are prohibited in EU and most major brands, but ASICS does not confirm supplier compliance on apparel. Risk is low in finished garments but real for dye workers.

Possible

Antimony in polyester production

Antimony oxide is a standard polyester catalyist; trace amounts can remain in finished fibers. Skin contact poses minimal risk in short-term wear. ASICS does not disclose antimony levels or alternative catalysts. This is an industry-wide issue, not brand-specific.

Reported

Microplastic shedding during washing

Synthetic fiber apparel sheds microfibers in washing, a known environmental hazard with emerging human health questions. Polyester/nylon blends shed more than natural fiber or blended synthetics with cotton. No product-specific test on Icon Shorts exists, but this is inherent to material type.

None known

Elastic degradation and heavy metal dyes in elastic components

No recalls or testing data suggest heavy metal contamination in elastic waistbands on ASICS shorts. Standard elastane (spandex) degrades over 1-2 years of regular wear; replacement is a maintenance issue, not a chemical safety issue, unless dyes on elastic contain lead or cadmium, which is not documented for this brand.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Waterproof Sports Gear

Patagonia Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

Patagonia

Men's 10" Quandary Shorts

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

A
A
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS1 flag

Lower concern. Patagonia uses PFC-free water-repellent coating; verify MADE SAFE label on tag.

MADE SAFE (PFAS-free DWR verified on some styles)

Lab test found no PFAS

More waterproof sports gear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.