Anolon · Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets
Anolon SureGrip Nonstick Kitchen Utensils 5-Piece Set, Gray
Nonstick utensils lack PFAS transparency; coating type unknown.
Anolon does not disclose nonstick coating chemistry or PFAS status for this utensil set. Many nonstick kitchen tools historically use Teflon-type coating-based coatings; without confirmation of safer alternatives, assume elevated risk.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Nonstick coating, type unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This is a utensil set with nonstick coating applied to what are likely silicone, nylon, or polypropylene handles and heads. Anolon does not publicly specify whether their nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon), ceramic, or an alternative polymer. The absence of transparency on coating chemistry is the primary safety concern here, as different nonstick technologies carry different thermal stability and leaching profiles.
The brand's record and disclosure
Anolon (owned by Groupe SEB) does not maintain a published PFAS reduction commitment or transparent material disclosure for their nonstick utensil lines. The brand has not issued recalls specific to PFAS contamination in utensils, but this silence reflects lack of third-party testing disclosure rather than demonstrated safety. Anolon markets durability and nonstick performance but provides no independent certification (e.g., GreenGuard, FDA testing summaries) for these utensils online.
How it compares in its category
Nonstick utensil sets occupy a middle ground: they avoid the durability concerns of bare silicone (which can degrade and shed microparticles) but introduce coating chemistry risk if Teflon-type coating-based. Competing brands like OXO and Calphalon now label PFOA-free status; Anolon's silence suggests either Teflon-type coating formulations without explicit PFOA removal claims or intentional vagueness. Ceramic or metal alternatives eliminate coating hazards entirely but sacrifice nonstick convenience.
If you buy it
Keep utensils below 400-450 degrees Fahrenheit; nonstick coatings begin to degrade or off-gas above this range. Hand-wash rather than dishwasher to extend coating life and reduce mechanical wear. Replace any utensils showing visible peeling, flaking, or discoloration of the coating. Store in a cool, dry place and avoid stacking with sharp objects that scratch the surface.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)
If this coating is Teflon-type coating-based, heating above 500 degrees Fahrenheit can release fluorinated polymer fumes. Anolon does not specify safe temperature limits or coating type in readily available product literature, leaving this risk unquantified for this specific line.
Coating degradation and microparticle shedding
All nonstick utensil coatings eventually flake or wear with use. While occasional ingestion of small flakes is not documented as causing acute harm, chronic exposure to microscopic coating debris is not well-studied. Inspect regularly and discard utensils with visible wear.
Handle material leaching (if silicone or plastic)
If handles are silicone or polypropylene, they may leach oligomers or additives when exposed to hot foods or oils, though this is not reported as a safety issue for this brand specifically. No third-party testing disclosed.
Undisclosed chemical composition
Anolon's refusal to name the nonstick coating chemistry (Teflon-type coating, ceramic, siloxane, etc.) on product pages prevents accurate hazard assessment. This lack of transparency is itself a consumer safety red flag in the nonstick cookware category.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets
Le Creuset
Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon
silicone (no nonstick coating)
Lower PFAS concern; silicone spatula carries minimal risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Le Creuset
Revolution Balloon Whisk
Stainless steel wire
Lower concern. Bare stainless steel whisk, no coating or nonstick surface.
⚠Risky category by default
Oxo Good Grips
3-Piece Silicone Utensil Set
Silicone utensil heads, thermoplastic handle
Lower concern. Silicone utensils carry minimal PFAS risk inherently.
⚠Risky category by default
More non-stick kitchen gadgets grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.