Anolon · Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets
Anolon SureGrip Nonstick Kitchen Utensil Set
Skip until brand discloses nonstick coating chemistry.
Anolon does not publicly specify the nonstick coating type or PFAS status of this utensil set. Without disclosure, PFAS risk cannot be assessed.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Nonstick coating, type unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Anolon SureGrip utensils feature a nonstick coating of unspecified chemistry, typically either Teflon-type coating-based (Teflon-type) or ceramic-polymer hybrid. The handle material is usually silicone or rubber over a core (metal or plastic), chosen for heat resistance and grip. Without Anolon's explicit disclosure of the coating formula, it is impossible to rule out Teflon-type coating or other concerning chemistry. The durability of the coating directly affects whether microparticles or base metals leach into food over time.
The brand's record and disclosure
Anolon (owned by Meyer Corporation) does not publicly disclose the nonstick coating chemistry of its SureGrip line or commit to PFAS-free formulations. The brand has no published third-party certifications for heavy metals or coating safety. Industry reports indicate Anolon has faced no major recalls for nonstick utensils, but the lack of transparency on formulation is consistent with many mainstream cookware makers who avoid PFAS commitments.
How it compares in its category
Nonstick utensil sets are lower-risk than nonstick cookware (pans and pots) because utensils contact food at lower temperatures and for shorter durations, reducing Teflon-type coating fume risk. However, they still occupy a middle ground: more transparent brands (e.g., GreenPan, Caraway) disclose ceramic or Teflon-type coating-free coatings, while budget alternatives offer no disclosure at all. Anolon's silence mirrors typical mid-market cookware makers, offering moderate convenience without transparency.
If you buy it
Keep utensils below 400-500F to minimize fume risk if the coating is Teflon-type coating-based. Hand wash rather than dishwash to slow coating wear and avoid alkaline detergent degradation. Replace utensils if the nonstick surface visibly flakes, chips, or peels. Request or search for Anolon's coating documentation before purchase; if unavailable, assume Teflon-type coating and use accordingly, or choose a brand with explicit PFAS-free certification.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Teflon-type coating fume inhalation risk
If coating is Teflon-type coating-based (not disclosed), heating above 500F can release fluorine compounds; utensils are lower-risk than cookware but still vulnerable if overheated or scratched coating is used.
Coating degradation and microparticle shedding
Nonstick coatings on utensils degrade with repeated dishwashing and use; small particles can shed into food, though toxicity of shed polymer is debated. No specific recalls for Anolon utensils on record, but generic risk of all nonstick kitchenware.
Heavy metals in base metal (lead/cadmium)
No public recalls or test data for Anolon SureGrip utensils; modern US-market utensils rarely contain lead or cadmium, but brand does not publish material certifications to confirm.
Handle material leaching (silicone or rubber)
If handles contain plasticizers or antimicrobial compounds, heat or prolonged contact with hot food may cause migration; silicone is generally stable, but brand does not specify handle polymer or additives.
Undisclosed PFAS in nonstick coating
Anolon's refusal to disclose coating chemistry or commit to PFAS-free status, combined with industry trends, suggests possible PFAS presence; utensil-specific PFAS risk is lower than cookware but not zero.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Kitchen Gadgets
Le Creuset
Signature Silicone Spatula Spoon
silicone (no nonstick coating)
Lower PFAS concern; silicone spatula carries minimal risk.
⚠Risky category by default
Le Creuset
Revolution Balloon Whisk
Stainless steel wire
Lower concern. Bare stainless steel whisk, no coating or nonstick surface.
⚠Risky category by default
Oxo Good Grips
3-Piece Silicone Utensil Set
Silicone utensil heads, thermoplastic handle
Lower concern. Silicone utensils carry minimal PFAS risk inherently.
⚠Risky category by default
More non-stick kitchen gadgets grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.