Ande · Fishing Line
Ande Tournament Monofilament Line
Lower concern, standard monofilament line unlikely to contain PFAS, but brand offers no transparency.
Ande Tournament Monofilament is a conventional nylon fishing line with no known PFAS-containing coatings or treatments. Fishing monofilament is not typically a category flagged for PFAS risk (unlike waterproof apparel or nonstick cookware), and nylon itself does not require PFAS.
Shop Ande on Amazon →Material
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ande Tournament Line is extruded nylon monofilament, a single continuous polymer strand commonly used in recreational and tournament fishing. Monofilament nylon is inherently stable and inert when used as intended (in water, at ambient temperature) and does not off-gas volatile compounds or leach problematic chemicals under normal fishing conditions. The material's main function is mechanical strength and abrasion resistance, not food contact or inhalation exposure, which limits typical consumer chemical hazards.
The brand's record and disclosure
Ande is a fishing-focused manufacturer owned by Pure Fishing and has a long-standing market presence in tournament and recreational segments. The brand does not publicly disclose material sourcing, manufacturing standards, or third-party safety certifications on this product line. No recalls, safety controversies, or regulatory violations for Ande monofilament are on record; the brand maintains a neutral public stance on PFAS and environmental additives without transparency statements.
How it compares in its category
Ande Tournament Line is a mid-to-premium offering in monofilament, positioned against brands like Berkley, Trilene, and Suffix. All commercial monofilament lines share the same base chemistry (nylon polymer) and comparable safety profiles; differentiation is performance (knot strength, abrasion resistance, color visibility), not material safety. No brand in the monofilament segment has established a safety advantage or undergoes independent chemical testing for consumer hazards.
If you buy it
Store the spool indoors in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight, which can degrade nylon over years and may cause brittleness rather than chemical leaching. Do not heat, melt, or burn monofilament indoors, as nylon can emit fumes; trim excess line and discard in trash or recycling. Replace the line annually or when you notice reduced knot strength, fraying, or visible discoloration, as age weakens nylon regardless of brand. Wash hands after extended handling if skin sensitivity exists, though nylon monofilament poses no known dermal hazard in normal use.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Nylon polymer degradation over time
Monofilament nylon degrades when exposed to UV light and heat, becoming brittle and prone to breakage; this is a performance and safety concern (line failure during use) rather than a chemical release hazard. Proper storage indoors extends line life and prevents premature degradation.
Thermal fume emission if heated or burned
If monofilament is intentionally heated, melted, or burned indoors, nylon can release irritant fumes typical of polymer combustion. This is a user-behavior hazard, not an inherent product risk, and is avoided by normal storage and disposal (trash or recycling, not burning).
Heavy metals in dyes or colorants
Monofilament lines are often dyed for visibility (green, clear, camouflage colors); industry standard dyes for nylon do not require heavy metal additives. No recalls or reports of lead, cadmium, or other metal contamination in Ande or competitor monofilament exist.
Microplastic shedding during use or disposal
Monofilament nylon may shed microfibers or fragments if abraded, frayed, or broken during fishing, and discarded line enters waterways; this is an environmental concern rather than a direct consumer health hazard. Proper disposal (trash or designated fishing line recycling) mitigates this risk.
Skin or eye irritation from polymer contact
Nylon monofilament is non-toxic and inert; no established cases of dermatitis or sensitization from contact with fishing line exist. Abrasion (line cuts, pressure marks) is a mechanical injury, not a chemical hazard.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Fishing Line
Stren
Original
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Lower PFAS concern for a fishing line product; no coating or treatment typical of PFAS carriers.
⚠Risky category by default
Maxima
Ultragreen One Shot
Lubricant/chain oil (mineral or synthetic base)
Lower PFAS concern for a chain lubricant; minimal Teflon-family coating/waterproofing risk profile.
⚠Risky category by default
Seaguar
Blue Label
Fluorocarbon fishing line (monofilament)
Fluorocarbon fishing line may contain PFAS; insufficient public data to grade definitively.
⚠Risky category by default
More fishing line grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.