Ande · Fishing Line
Ande Premium Monofilament
Lower-concern fishing line; monofilament nylon rarely requires PFAS, but Ande makes no public disclosure.
Ande Premium Monofilament is standard nylon fishing line with no known PFAS coatings or treatments. The brand provides no PFAS claim or testing data. Monofilament fishing line is not a typical PFAS risk category, but lack of transparency leaves room for uncertainty.
Shop Ande on Amazon →Material
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ande Premium Monofilament is extruded nylon (polyamide 6 or 6.6), a thermoplastic polymer with no known requirement for PFAS water-repellency or other functional additives in fishing line formulation. The material is inherently stable when cast and stored at room temperature, and does not off-gas volatile organics under normal use. No glazes, enamels, or coatings are involved, eliminating ceramic-type leaching pathways.
The brand's record and disclosure
Ande is a legacy fishing-tackle manufacturer with no public PFAS disclosure policy and no widely documented safety controversies in the fishing-line space. The brand does not advertise third-party certifications (e.g., Nordic Swan, EU Ecolabel) for chemical safety, but such certifications are uncommon across the monofilament category. Absence of disclosure does not signal hidden hazards; it reflects the category norm of minimal regulatory scrutiny.
How it compares in its category
Monofilament nylon lines (Ande, Berkley, Trilene, Suffix) share the same base-material profile and carry equivalent chemical hazard profiles. Braided and fluorocarbon lines may introduce additional processing steps and dyes, but no evidence links them to lower overall chemical risk. Ande's position is middle-of-pack: established brand with no outstanding safety record, positive or negative.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent UV embrittlement and color fading, which are cosmetic rather than toxicity concerns. Replace line annually or when visibly cracked, kinked, or discolored, as degraded nylon can shed microfibers into water; this is a microplastic-shedding issue, not a chemical leaching issue. Dispose of spent line responsibly (solid waste, not water) to avoid entanglement hazards to wildlife.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Microplastic shedding from degradation
Monofilament nylon degrades under UV and mechanical stress, releasing nylon microfibers into freshwater and marine environments. This is a physical hazard tied to product lifecycle, not chemical toxicity of the polymer itself.
Heavy metals or dyes in coloration
Ande Premium Monofilament is available in standard colors (clear, green, brown, pink). No published data indicates use of lead, cadmium, or azo dyes in monofilament lines; modern nylon colorants are typically organic or inorganic non-heavy-metal pigments. Verification would require manufacturer disclosure.
Leaching from nylon polymer itself
Nylon does not hydrolyze or leach monomers (caprolactam) significantly at room temperature or in aqueous environments. Any historical caprolactam release occurs during manufacturing, not in-use. No reports link monofilament fishing line to water contamination from polymer breakdown.
Additives (plasticizers, stabilizers, slip agents)
Commercial monofilament typically contains UV stabilizers and minor processing aids, but Ande does not disclose formulation. Industry practice favors hindered-amine light stabilizers (HALS) over phthalates; no evidence of phthalate use in modern fishing line. Absence of disclosure limits certainty.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Fishing Line
Stren
Original
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Lower PFAS concern for a fishing line product; no coating or treatment typical of PFAS carriers.
⚠Risky category by default
Maxima
Ultragreen One Shot
Lubricant/chain oil (mineral or synthetic base)
Lower PFAS concern for a chain lubricant; minimal Teflon-family coating/waterproofing risk profile.
⚠Risky category by default
Seaguar
Blue Label
Fluorocarbon fishing line (monofilament)
Fluorocarbon fishing line may contain PFAS; insufficient public data to grade definitively.
⚠Risky category by default
More fishing line grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.