Ande · Fishing Line
Ande Ghost Monofilament Line
Lower concern, standard nylon monofilament line with no known PFAS treatment, but verify with manufacturer if worried.
Ande Ghost is a standard nylon monofilament fishing line with no public PFAS claims or disclosures from the brand. Monofilament fishing line is not typically treated with PFAS-based coatings or water-repellent coating finishes. No third-party testing or certifications found; contact Ande directly if PFAS content is a deal-breaker.
Shop Ande on Amazon →Material
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
other is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ande Ghost is extruded nylon monofilament, a single continuous polymer strand engineered for strength and low visibility underwater. Nylon monofilament does not contain added Teflon-type coating (Teflon), so fume risk during manufacture or use is not a concern unlike some coated lines. The material is inert in water and does not leach significant amounts of monomers or additives under normal fishing conditions. Over decades in freshwater or saltwater, nylon degrades slowly via UV and hydrolysis, but this does not pose acute health risks to the angler.
The brand's record and disclosure
Ande is a longstanding fishing-line manufacturer owned by Berkley (a major tackle brand under Pure Fishing). The company does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient lists, manufacturing processes, or third-party test data for PFAS or other chemical treatments. No major product recalls or safety controversies are on record for Ande monofilament. The brand is recognized for consistent quality and strength ratings but does not market sustainability or low-chemical certifications.
How it compares in its category
Ande Ghost sits in the mid-to-premium segment of monofilament lines and is comparable to Trilene and Berkley Trilene in composition and safety profile. Some brands (e.g., Cortland, Maxima) publish more detailed environmental or chemical data; Ande's silence on this is typical for mainstream tackle manufacturers. Braided lines and fluorocarbon alternatives carry different but overlapping material concerns and are not inherently safer from a chemical standpoint.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow UV degradation and maintain knot strength. Do not heat the line deliberately; nylon softens around 180, 220 degrees Celsius, which is not relevant to normal angling but matters if you trim or fuse ends. Replace the line annually or whenever you notice cloudiness, brittleness, or knot failures. Dispose of used line responsibly in a trash bin; do not flush or leave in the environment, as it persists and can entangle wildlife.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Nylon polymer degradation and microplastic shedding
Monofilament naturally breaks down over time via UV exposure and water hydrolysis, shedding microscopic fibers. While this occurs slowly under normal use, abandoned or lost fishing line is a recognized source of persistent microplastics in aquatic ecosystems; the hazard is environmental rather than to the direct user.
Knot and tensile failure from improper storage
Nylon monofilament loses strength and elasticity when exposed to heat, sunlight, or ozone over months. Ande Ghost packaging does not typically include UV-protection guidance, so users may store spools in sun-exposed tackle boxes, accelerating degradation and increasing breakage risk during use.
Chemical additives in colorant or UV stabilizer
Ande Ghost uses proprietary dyes and UV absorbers to achieve its low-visibility 'ghost' clear appearance, but no public data identifies these as hazardous. Standard nylon additives (e.g., tinuvins, carbon black) are regulated under FDA and EU polymer guidelines; no violations or concerns are on record for this brand.
Heavy metals in pigments (if any applied coating)
Monofilament is not enameled or coated with ceramic or metallic finishes, so lead or cadmium in surface coatings is not applicable. The line itself is bulk-extruded nylon and does not undergo glazing or painting steps that could introduce metal contaminants.
Leaching of monomer or plasticizer into water during use
Nylon monofilament does not typically leach caprolactam (the nylon 6 monomer) or phthalates at rates of concern in water at ambient temperature. Long-term submersion in freshwater or saltwater has not been associated with measurable migration of harmful substances to the angler or aquatic life in peer-reviewed studies.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Fishing Line
Stren
Original
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Lower PFAS concern for a fishing line product; no coating or treatment typical of PFAS carriers.
⚠Risky category by default
Maxima
Ultragreen One Shot
Lubricant/chain oil (mineral or synthetic base)
Lower PFAS concern for a chain lubricant; minimal Teflon-family coating/waterproofing risk profile.
⚠Risky category by default
Seaguar
Blue Label
Fluorocarbon fishing line (monofilament)
Fluorocarbon fishing line may contain PFAS; insufficient public data to grade definitively.
⚠Risky category by default
More fishing line grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.