Anasol · Sunscreen
Facial Sunscreen SPF 99 Oil Free Skin Care Moisturizing Protection 60g Anasol
Lower concern, but Anasol provides no PFAS transparency, typical for this category.
Anasol's oil-free sunscreen formulation is a standard cosmetic emulsion with no known high-risk PFAS-prone processes (non-Teflon-family coating coated, not a water-repellent coating textile). However, the brand makes no public PFAS disclosure or third-party testing claims.
Shop Anasol on Amazon →Material
Sunscreen emulsion (mineral/chemical UV filters, water, glycerin, oils)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Category baseline
cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
Safe base material
Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This is a water-based sunscreen emulsion combining UV filters (likely organic/chemical and/or mineral actives like zinc oxide or titanium dioxide), glycerin humectant, and light oils for spreadability. The 'oil-free' claim suggests minimal occlusive oils but likely contains lightweight silicones or plant-derived alternatives to maintain texture. No published specifications on which UV filters Anasol uses, making it impossible to assess specific filter safety profiles (e.g., oxybenzone vs. safer alternatives).
The brand's record and disclosure
Anasol maintains minimal public transparency on ingredient sourcing, manufacturing standards, or safety testing. No formal third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, reef-safe, cruelty-free) are readily advertised. The brand has not faced major product recalls or safety controversies on public record, but the lack of proactive disclosure is typical of smaller or regional skincare brands and suggests lower investment in independent verification.
How it compares in its category
Sunscreens marketed as 'moisturizing' with high SPF (99) are common mid-market products. Anasol's positioning sits between budget drugstore formulas and premium brands offering reef-safe, mineral-only, or certified organic options. The absence of publicized certifications or ingredient transparency places it in a cautious middle ground where consumers must rely on brand reputation rather than third-party validation.
If you buy it
Apply a full-coverage amount (quarter-teaspoon for face) 15 minutes before sun exposure and reapply every 2 hours or after swimming. Perform a patch test on inner arm or behind ear first, as fragrances or actives may irritate sensitive skin. Store in cool, dry conditions and discard after 12 months of opening, as UV filter potency degrades over time. If you experience redness, stinging, or rash within 24 hours, discontinue and consider a certified hypoallergenic or mineral-only alternative.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Chemical UV filter safety (specific actives unknown)
Anasol does not publicly disclose whether it uses oxybenzone, octinoxate, or other debated organic filters vs. safer alternatives like avobenzone or non-nano mineral actives. Systemic absorption of certain chemical filters is documented in dermatology literature; without ingredient transparency, risk cannot be fully assessed.
Formaldehyde releasers in preservatives
Water-based emulsions require preservatives to prevent microbial growth. Some budget and mid-market brands use formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (e.g., dmdm hydantoin, imidazolidinyl urea) rather than gentler alternatives. Anasol's preservative system is not publicly listed, making this a blind spot for consumers with formaldehyde sensitivity.
Microplastics in cosmetic formulas
No published evidence of microbeads or plastic microparticles in Anasol sunscreen. However, some 'oil-free' sunscreens use spherical silicone or polyethylene microspheres for texture; full ingredient disclosure would be needed to rule this out.
Heavy metals in mineral filters (if mineral actives used)
If the SPF 99 claim relies on zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, contamination with lead or cadmium is theoretically possible if ore sourcing is unregulated. No recalls of Anasol sunscreen for heavy metals on record, but lack of third-party testing certification leaves this unverified.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 72% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Sunscreen
Goddess Garden
Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 6 oz
mineral-based UV filters, plant-derived waxes
Lower-concern mineral sunscreen with credible PFAS-exclusion certification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Eco Formula SPF 30 Sunscreen
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide)
Lower PFAS concern; mineral sunscreen with third-party verification and no known fluorochemical history.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Raw Elements
Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging
Lower-concern choice; mineral sunscreen + explicit PFAS-free positioning + third-party certs reduce risk.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More sunscreen grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.