Architecture Soft Matte Blurring Foundation vs Traceless Soft Matte Concealer: which is safer?

Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte Blurring Foundation is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Tom Ford Architecture Soft Matte Blurring Foundation

Tom Ford

Architecture Soft Matte Blurring Foundation

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

D 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

water-based pigments, silicone, mineral powders

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane contamination

PossibleFragrance allergens

Tom Ford Traceless Soft Matte Concealer

Tom Ford

Traceless Soft Matte Concealer

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

F 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

liquid concealer with silicone and mineral pigments

Confidence

72%

PossiblePreservative allergens and irritants

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers

PossibleCyclopentasiloxane (D5) siloxane polymer

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More concealer: see the full ranking