Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display vs Chrono 42 Quartz Watch: which is safer?

Swatch Chrono 42 Quartz Watch is the clear pick. Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display

Samsung

Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display

PFAS grade

F 40/100

Overall grade

F 32/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Titanium case, AMOLED display, unspecified water-resistant coatings

Confidence

35%

PossibleUndisclosed waterproof coatings (likely PFAS-based)

PossibleBand material allergens (if non-OEM)

Our pick

Swatch Chrono 42 Quartz Watch

Swatch

Chrono 42 Quartz Watch

PFAS grade

B 85/100

Overall grade

C 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Stainless steel case, mineral/plastic crystal, standard watch components

Confidence

72%

PossibleMineral crystal breakage and laceration

PossibleBattery chemical leakage (internal only)

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof smartwatches & fitness trackers: see the full ranking