Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin vs Plastic Free Sunscreen Pack SPF 30: which is safer?

Raw Elements Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Raw Elements

Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

A 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

mineral-based sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide); tin container

Confidence

78%

PossiblePreservative contamination (1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde releasers)

Why this gradeBuy

Raw Elements

Plastic Free Sunscreen Pack SPF 30

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

B 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

mineral-based active ingredients; plastic-free packaging

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMineral active (titanium dioxide/zinc oxide) white cast and irritation

PossibleOxidative degradation of inactive moisturizing oils (if present)

Why this gradeBuy

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More sunscreen: see the full ranking