Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30 vs Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin: which is safer?
Raw Elements Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Raw Elements
Face & Body Sunscreen Tin SPF 30
PFAS grade
A 100/100
Overall grade
B 88/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
mineral sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide), tin packaging
Confidence
82%
PossibleEpoxy resin coating in tin lining
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleNano particle inhalation from loose powder form
Our pick
Raw Elements
Mike Field Face & Body SPF 30 Tin
PFAS grade
A 100/100
Overall grade
A 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
mineral-based sunscreen (zinc oxide/titanium dioxide); tin container
Confidence
78%
PossiblePreservative contamination (1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde releasers)
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More sunscreen: see the full ranking