Pro-V Classic Clean Conditioner vs Shea Moisture Curl Shine Conditioner Coconut Hibiscus: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Pantene Pro-V Classic Clean Conditioner

Pantene

Pro-V Classic Clean Conditioner

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

D 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

aqueous conditioner formulation (surfactants, silicones, humectants, polymers)

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane contamination

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitivizers

Shea Moisture Curl Shine Conditioner Coconut Hibiscus

SheaMoisture

Shea Moisture Curl Shine Conditioner Coconut Hibiscus

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

D 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

water-based conditioner; coconut oil, shea butter, hibiscus extract

Confidence

82%

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers

PossibleContact dermatitis from plant extracts

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More conditioner: see the full ranking