Dry Sack 3L w/Window vs Terravia Pack 14L: which is safer?

Patagonia Terravia Pack 14L is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Osprey

Dry Sack 3L w/Window

PFAS grade

F 20/100

Overall grade

F 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon fabric with water-repellent coating, window unclear

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from coating degradation

PossibleWindow material identity and leaching

Why this grade

Our pick

Patagonia

Terravia Pack 14L

PFAS grade

F 20/100

Overall grade

F 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

recycled nylon with water-repellent coating finish

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish composition

PossibleDegradation and microplastic shedding

Why this grade

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof outdoor bags: see the full ranking