Bond Maintenance Conditioner No. 5 vs Pro-V Classic Clean Conditioner: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Olaplex
Bond Maintenance Conditioner No. 5
PFAS grade
C 75/100
Overall grade
D 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Water-based conditioning polymers, silicones, plant-derived conditioning agents
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers
PossibleSilicone accumulation and buildup
Pantene
Pro-V Classic Clean Conditioner
PFAS grade
C 75/100
Overall grade
D 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
aqueous conditioner formulation (surfactants, silicones, humectants, polymers)
Confidence
72%
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitivizers
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More conditioner: see the full ranking