Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners vs Slow Cooking Liners: which is safer?

Slow Cooking Liners is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

If You Care

Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners

PFAS grade

A 90/100

Overall grade

B 82/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

silicone-free paper or parchment-based lining

Confidence

72%

PossibleCellulose fiber shedding with heat and moisture

PossibleBacterial or mold growth on stored paper

Why this gradeBuy

Our pick

If You Care

Slow Cooking Liners

PFAS grade

A 100/100

Overall grade

B 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Unbleached parchment paper

Confidence

78%

PossibleThermal degradation and smoke at high heat

PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp

PossibleAdhesion failure and paper fragments in food

Why this gradeBuy

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More slow cooker liners: see the full ranking