Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer- Brief Underwear 3-Pack vs Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack: which is safer?

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Gap

Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer- Brief Underwear 3-Pack

PFAS grade

F 20/100

Overall grade

F 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Confidence

45%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishes

PossibleAntimony in polyester

LikelyMicrofiber shedding during laundering

Why this grade

Our pick

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleElastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)

Why this grade

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports & performance undergarments: see the full ranking