Women's Breathable Micro-Mesh High-Cut Briefs (6 vs Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack: which is safer?

Fruit of the Loom Women's Breathable Micro-Mesh High-Cut Briefs (6 is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Fruit of the Loom Women's Breathable Micro-Mesh High-Cut Briefs (6

Fruit of the Loom

Women's Breathable Micro-Mesh High-Cut Briefs (6

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

nylon and elastane micro-mesh, untreated

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metals in pigments

PossibleElastane (spandex) allergic sensitization

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleElastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports & performance undergarments: see the full ranking