Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs vs Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack: which is safer?

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Fruit of the Loom Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs

Fruit of the Loom

Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs

PFAS grade

F 25/100

Overall grade

F 3/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester/nylon blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Confidence

52%

PossiblePFAS in moisture-wicking finish

LikelyMicroplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

Our pick

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleElastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports & performance undergarments: see the full ranking