Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover vs Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

ETHAN allen Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

Ethan Allen

Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

F 41/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

polyester fabric with unknown finish treatment

Confidence

45%

PossibleFlame retardants (brominated or phosphorus-based)

LikelyVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

PossibleWater repellent finish degradation and leachables

Ethan Allen Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

Ethan Allen

Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

PFAS grade

C 75/100

Overall grade

F 41/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

upholstery fabric (composition unspecified)

Confidence

35%

PossibleFormaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in fabric finishes

PossibleFlame retardant chemicals (brominated or phosphate-based)

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments in synthetic fibers

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More stain-resistant textiles: see the full ranking