Universal Padding Fit Kit vs Symphony Sport All-in-One Pad Set: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Easton Universal Padding Fit Kit

Easton

Universal Padding Fit Kit

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 43/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

foam padding, elastic straps

Confidence

72%

PossiblePolyurethane foam off-gassing (VOCs)

PossibleAdhesive leachables

PossibleElastic synthetic fiber irritation

Symphony Sport All-in-One Pad Set

Evenflo

Symphony Sport All-in-One Pad Set

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 43/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Fabric, likely cotton blend or polyester

Confidence

62%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins (shrink-resist / wrinkle-proof finishes)

PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants with heavy metal co-catalysts)

PossibleAntimony (polyester synthesis catalyst residue)

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More sports equipment padding: see the full ranking