Men's Sports Cushions Shock Absorbing Shoe Inserts vs Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes: which is safer?

PUMA Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Dr. Scholl's

Men's Sports Cushions Shock Absorbing Shoe Inserts

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

foam cushioning, likely polyurethane or EVA

Confidence

72%

PossibleAdhesive or bonding agent degradation

PossibleOdor and microbial growth in degraded foam

PossibleContact dermatitis from dyes or finishes

Why this grade

Our pick

Puma

Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Mesh textile upper, foam midsole, rubber outsole

Confidence

62%

PossibleAdhesive and bonding agent leachables

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from foam midsole

Why this grade

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking