Men's Athletic Series Running Insoles vs Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Dr. Scholl's Men's Athletic Series Running Insoles

Dr. Scholl's

Men's Athletic Series Running Insoles

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Foam cushioning, gel, textile cover

Confidence

72%

PossiblePolyurethane foam off-gassing and degradation

PossibleAllergens in textile or adhesives

PUMA Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes

Puma

Men's Softride Symmetry Fuzion Low-top Running Shoes

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Mesh textile upper, foam midsole, rubber outsole

Confidence

62%

PossibleAdhesive and bonding agent leachables

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from foam midsole

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking