Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles vs Gel Total Support Insoles: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Dr. Scholl's Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles

Dr. Scholl's

Go Sockless! Cushioning Insoles

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

foam cushioning, polyurethane gel, textile cover

Confidence

72%

PossiblePolyurethane foam degradation and particle shedding

PossiblePFAS in polyurethane gel layer or textile water-repellent treatment

Spenco Gel Total Support Insoles

Spenco

Gel Total Support Insoles

PFAS grade

D 65/100

Overall grade

F 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Gel cushioning with foam base, materials not fully disclosed

Confidence

62%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins (in foam base bonding)

PossibleMicroplastics shedding from gel degradation

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More athletic insoles & orthotics: see the full ranking